Posted on 03/03/2002 6:18:34 AM PST by daapfe
I AM CURIOUS when will the american people open their eyes to the crazy and misguided ways of the democrap Party. I mean for the last 35 years the left has brought our country from a strong morally found country to a country of well fare and government hand outs, to anti americanism and disgusting policies. For one I think that if the democrats would step aside and let the republicans and libertarians have there way the country would be stronger and better then it has been in 35 years.. Democrats have had there shot.. And all we have for it is the lowest morals and class fighting we have seen in many years..It is time for all americans to open their eyes and let the republicans have a shot at making our country the great strong nation it use to be. We need only look at how the demonazis are treating GW now to realise their true colors. TO question GW at a time of war is a clear sign of DESPARATION. OPEN YOUR EYES AMERICA LET THE RIGHT SIDE HAVE A SHOT...
I FORMAGGI dal latte di buon pascolo i formaggi più pregiati Dal latte al formaggio Formaggi e nutrizione Mappa dei formaggi più tipici |
Il latte, di buon pascolo, e soprattutto quel suo derivato assai egregio che è il formaggio, viene oggigiorno sempre più proposto dai nutrizionisti per assicurare all'organismo proteine alternative pregiate, che lopinione delluomo della strada reputa abbondanti solo nelle carni. La carne ha sì proteine, cioè i principi nutritivi di base dell'alimentazione, le sostanze che, essendo "plastiche" per eccellenza, rafforzano la carrozzeria umana nella fase di accrescimento evolutivo, riparando le usure giornaliere in ogni organo e apparato. Ma proteine ha anche il latte e, in grande concentrazione, un buon formaggio. Per buon formaggio ha da intendersi un delicato prodotto dellarte casearia, a partire dalla materia prima, che è il latte.
Quanto migliore è la qualità del latte, tanto risulta ottimale il prodotto della caseificazione. La qualità dei pascoli rappresentano un fattore determinante per le mucche da latte. La fragranza dei pascoli si trasfonde in quel latte, e da questo passa al burro, al formaggio, alle ricotte.
I formaggi sono alimenti ottenuti dal latte intero o parzialmente scremato o scremato, in seguito a coagulazione acida o presamica (ad opera di enzimi presenti nello stomaco dei ruminanti). Il coagulo (cagliata) subisce poi una serie di trattamenti diversi a seconda del tipo di formaggio che si vuole produrre. I formaggi freschi hanno un contenuto di acqua più elevato dei formaggi stagionati che, in quanto tali, hanno subito una concentrazione dei nutrienti che sono in essi contenuti. Essendo dei derivati del latte, i formaggi contengono gli stessi principi nutritivi di questo alimento (ad eccezione del lattosio e di una parte di proteine del siero che sfuggono alla cagliata), ma in quantità notevolmente più abbondanti: costituiscono pertanto la miglior fonte di calcio alimentare e sono eccellenti apportatori di proteine di elevato valore biologico, nonché di lipidi. Questi ultimi raggiungono quantità variabili tra il 16 e il 40 per cento e oltre.
I formaggi costituiscono quindi da soli un ottimo secondo piatto e non devono essere consumati in aggiunta a questo o come «fine pasto». Alcuni tipi di formaggio possono venire inoculati con particolari microrganismi, quali muffe, che conferiscono al prodotto sapore ed aroma caratteristici (gorgonzola, robiole, roquefort eccetera). La ricotta, formaggio che deve essere consumato freschissimo, si ottiene per riscaldamento (ricotta) a 70/75° C del siero di latte (cioè della parte che rimane dalla lavorazione del formaggio) di pecora o di vacca, dopo aggiunta di un acidificante. Il contenuto lipidico della ricotta di pecora è più elevato di quello della ricotta di vacca e, conseguentemente, anche il loro apporto energetico è differente.
(da Atlante ragionato di alimentazione Istituto SCOTTI BASSANI
per la ricerca e linformazione scientifica e nutrizionale - Milano)
Not much difference between Democrats and Republicans here. Only difference is that Republicans call it "compassionate conservatism."
Newt (whom I much admire) was the last national Republican to take a serious stab at reducing govt. But Newt blinked when Slick shut down the govt, and no significant Republican has had the guts to try again since. Probably because the majority of Republicans WANT a welfare state (i.e., SSI, student loans, farm subsidies, "disaster relief" to areas routinely hit by tornadoes, floods, etc.)
TO question GW at a time of war is
A GOOD THING.
Slaves never question their dictators. Free people should ALWAYS question their leaders.
Until such time as responsible people start acting like they care about our country, we will continue to have the likes of DascHOLE, Kennedy, Feinstein, Hillary clintonov and the rest of that ilk gumming up the works of governance and defiling our Constitution.
It's really no more complicated than that.
I would suggest a national voucher program with the $ amount proportional to the taxes applied at the local level, then toll in the federal subsidies on top of that amount. This should more than compensate parents for a private school or funding for home schooling.
We'll have to annihilate the NEA and other educational associations at a political level quite some time before we can get this accomplished but it will happen as the exodus from the public schools continues and homeschooling and private school enrollment crescendo. Such liberal leaning associations will simply become insignificant.
Once the majority of children are provided with a meaningful education and rational thought process, the Democrats themselves will become insignificant..
It's good for treating moose bites.
After the next terroirst attack or economic collapse rivaling 1932.
Newt was the last serious attempt to trim govt -- and even he only attempt a trim, albeit a serious trim.
But if Newt "scared" so many Americans with his "extremism," what hope is there for a serious govt rollback?
Americans love their pioneer image, but most modern Americans really want security and safety. They love "risking" on the market, and crow over their profits -- but scream for a govt bailout it the stock tumbles.
Rush hails Bush's tinny tax trim as though it represented a significant difference between the Dems and GOP. No wonder so many Libertarians are cynical about the GOP's "small govt" self-image.
And where is Bush on rolling back affirmative action? The GOP cold shouldered Ward Connerly, ignoring his attempts to stop affirmative action in Florida.
Well, FYI, Ward Connerly spoke at the California Libertarian Convention last month. The LP is wooing Connerly to switch parties from GOP to LP. Connerly hasn't said yes or no, but I hear from LP sources who were at the convention that Connerly is seriously listening to the LP. Connerly appears to be getting sick of the GOP's cold shouldering him.
In the existing environment, calls for lower taxes can be seen a helping relatively few people. When these people are characterized as the "rich elite", it is easy to oppose general tax relief or smaller government as the "compassionate" position in terms of political ethics.
After all, it is well reported that a smaller federal government will result in renewed victimization of minorities, seniors having to eat cat food from garbage cans, and the deliberate starvation of children through out the country.
There is absolutely no reason to believe that the demographics of the national population, the pro-government, politically correct, "diversity" worshipping educational system, and the biased perspective of the national media will improve. In fact, the opposite will happen.
These components make possible the election of individuals who would be judged as weird aberrations in a more intelligent and sane environment--The Hillary Clintons, Barbara Boxers, Tom Daschles, etc.
There seems to be little hope for a return to sanity in the foreseeable future. Eventually, the current government by Ponzi-scheme will have to collapse under the weight of its own corruption. What will follow is, I submit, not at all clear.
Better be wearing asbestos skivvies around FR making statements like that. The back-alley abortionist lobby, er, the "pro-lifers", will be all over you!
But seriously, Republicans have painted themselves into a corner with support for morality legislation. If they stick to economic issues, they'll win -- they should leave the moralizing for the reverends and priests.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.