Skip to comments.
Study Hints at How Genetic Mutations Led to Macroevolutionary Change
Scientific American ^
| Kate Wong
Posted on 02/07/2002 8:49:05 AM PST by realpatriot71
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
61
posted on
02/07/2002 3:39:25 PM PST
by
cornelis
To: cornelis
Looks like some
de-evolution there . . .
:-)
To: toddhisattva
Oh yeah? You're just a science-hating goddist! Not "goddite"? "Goddian?" "Goddoid"?
To: cornelis
LOL!
64
posted on
02/07/2002 5:42:45 PM PST
by
Nebullis
To: *Evolution
To: realpatriot71
I wonder what Michael Behe would say about this?
To: realpatriot71
LOL! Anything older than my birthdate is approximate.
To: toddhisattva
We should never forget that "species" is a man-made concept,...Excellent point. "Species" is a convenient label. Nature produces individuals, man produces classifications. Individuals do not belong to species. This is why classification is somewhat slippery at the boundaries. Some people to belive that the "species" which an individual belongs to determines that individual's properties. (Especially in sociology.) It's really vice versa.
To: realpatriot71
69
posted on
02/08/2002 10:04:09 AM PST
by
Junior
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
