Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I knew there was a reason I never watched ROOTS. (Did a search and didn't find this)
1 posted on 01/16/2002 7:02:49 AM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: goodnesswins
wow. I'd never heard about any of this before.

Thanks for the info!

2 posted on 01/16/2002 7:12:28 AM PST by MudPuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins
I remember when this was first aired on network tv. The thing that was touted most was that it was the first time there would be frontal nudity of a (black) woman. Had to do with the 'truth' and 'importance' of the story, don't 'cha know.
3 posted on 01/16/2002 7:19:26 AM PST by uvular
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins
Don'tcha just love it? But it makes us feeeeeeel good about diverrrrrrrsity, so who cares if it's truth or not?
4 posted on 01/16/2002 7:23:05 AM PST by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins
I am an avid reader and this is the first I have heard about this. Shocking to say the least.

I remember watching Roots as a youngster. Its still a powerful story at the very least.

Going to have to add this to my list of "Things to read up on" for the year....(right after I finish re-reading the Dune series and C.S. Lewis)

5 posted on 01/16/2002 7:26:05 AM PST by Portnoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins
Very interesting. I hadn't realized that the story was supposed to have been an autobiography. I thought it was a piece of fiction...guess I wasn't wrong after all!
7 posted on 01/16/2002 7:26:47 AM PST by Dawntreader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins
I read an article shortly after Roots came out in which two professional genealogists wrote that the book was a total fraud.

I recall one statement of theirs in which they lamented the fact that the book had been praised by other professional genealogists who had not studied it at all.

Another thing which they said was considered beyond the pale for genealogists, was that Haley knowingly and falsely claimed descent from a real White family in Virginia.

9 posted on 01/16/2002 7:33:08 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins
But as the late John Henrik Clarke, dean of Afrocentrist scholars - who admitted that he "cried real tears when I realized that Haley was less than authentic" - argued: "We don't need no more fakers. We don't need no more phonies. We can take our tea with or without sugar."

"We don't need no more"?....is this what's passing for proper use of the English language amongst 'scholars' nowadays?

 

10 posted on 01/16/2002 7:34:49 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins; *Afrocentricity
Tea with or without sugar bump.
12 posted on 01/16/2002 7:44:54 AM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins
Then-Vice President Al Gore said at the time, "George Haley is the direct descendant of Kunta Kinte."

Well, there's the final authority on it.

14 posted on 01/16/2002 7:58:14 AM PST by TroutStalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson