Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dcwusmc

21 USCS Section 801 (1996)

Section 801. Findings and declarations

The Congress makes the following findings and declarations:

(1) Many of the drugs included within this title have a useful and legitimate medical purpose and are necessary to maintain the health and general welfare of the American people.

(2) The illegal importation, manufacture, distribution, and possession and improper use of controlled substances have a substantial and detrimental effect on the health and general welfare of the American people.

(3) A major portion of the traffic in controlled substances flows through interstate and foreign commerce. Incidents of the traffic which are not an integral part of the interstate or foreign flow, such as manufacture, local distribution, and possession, nonetheless have a substantial and direct effect upon interstate commerce because--

(A) after manufacture, many controlled substances are transported in interstate commerce,
(B) controlled substances distributed locally usually have been transported in interstate commerce immediately before their distribution, and
(C) controlled substances possessed commonly flow through interstate commerce immediately prior to such possession.

(4) Local distribution and possession of controlled substances contribute to swelling the interstate traffic in such substances.

(5) Controlled substances manufactured and distributed intrastate cannot be differentiated from controlled substances manufactured and distributed interstate. Thus, it is not feasible to distinguish, in terms of controls, between controlled substances manufactured and distributed interstate and controlled substances manufactured and distributed intrastate.

(6) Federal control of the intrastate incidents of the traffic in controlled substances is essential to the effective control of the interstate incidents of such traffic.

(7) The United States is a party to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, and other international conventions designed to establish effective control over international and domestic traffic in controlled substances.

2,093 posted on 02/16/2002 7:33:04 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2092 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
Sounds like the Congress can constitutionally ban any substance, as long as it justifies the ban in the name of General Welfare, and uses the mechanism of "control of interstate commerce."
2,094 posted on 02/16/2002 8:00:22 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2093 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe
Since the ICC was intended SOLELY to keep the states trading fairly with each other, not to give FedGov an opening to ban whatever it felt like and since prohibiting possession of anything based on what someone MIGHT do with it is prior restraint, which is outlawed, I still fail to see where you have a Constitutional leg to stand on. Your constant posting of this "finding" does nothing for your case and makes you look like a grinning, posturing jacka$$, like any other 'Rat control freak.
2,107 posted on 02/17/2002 12:28:31 PM PST by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2093 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson