Is it MS fault that the person using the system does not have enough knowledge or skill to make proper use of it? One last time, I'll try honest reason:
The law clearly states they HAVE to disclose the defect. They did not disclose the defect. Therefore they comitted fraud.
This is as open-and-shut a case as you can get! What is it in that simple, straight-forward reasoning that you disgree with?
There is no reason to shout here, I thought we were discussing an issue. My point is:
There is no defect. The feature does what it is suppossed to do. It configures network devices.