Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Libertarian] Arab American hopes to unseat Rep. Lantos
SJ Mercury News ^ | 12/22/01 | Chuck Carroll

Posted on 12/22/2001 8:04:02 AM PST by tpaine

Arab American hopes to unseat Rep. Lantos

BY CHUCK CARROLL Mercury News

At a time when some Arab Americans and Muslims are lying low amid a perceived backlash in the wake of Sept. 11, Maad Abu-Ghazala is doing quite the opposite. He's running for Congress.

His opponent is Tom Lantos, one of Israel's strongest supporters and a Holocaust survivor who has been elected 11 times to represent the 12th District on the upper San Francisco Peninsula.

Abu-Ghazala, a 39-year-old software entrepreneur and attorney from Pacifica, was born in what was then part of Jordan.

He's running as a Libertarian. Normally, Libertarians are all but ignored by the major-party candidates, the mainstream media and political contributors. But, as Abu-Ghazala said, with their sharply contrasting backgrounds, this matchup is ``made for TV, almost.´´

That, combined with his determination to force a deeper discussion about why America finds itself fighting a war on terrorism, and whether Americans are giving up too much freedom in that war's prosecution, makes this contest anything but run-of-the-mill.

Lantos, who was in Washington this week as a busy Congress rushed to break for the holidays, did not return calls about the race.

Abu-Ghazala is a novice in electoral politics, but he's a member of the board of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. This week he spoke at a news conference to keep attention focused on the hundreds of people being held without charges by the FBI as part of the terrorism investigation. Abu-Ghazala said he was thinking of running even before Sept. 11, but the aftermath pushed him into the race despite the long odds and his controversial positions.

Shortly after the hijacked planes slammed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Abu-Ghazala said, he was appalled to hear that only 70 percent of Americans polled said the United States should make sure it knows who is responsible for the attack before striking back. It made him wonder about the other 30 percent of Americans.

``We just needed to bomb somebody,´´ he said. ``There was some level of that all over.´´

He also has watched in alarm as, in his view, constitutional protections and legal rights have been eroded ``with virtually no discussion.´´ As an attorney, Abu-Ghazala is especially outraged by Attorney General John Ashcroft´s announcement that the Justice Department would be monitoring communications between defense lawyers and certain terrorism suspects.

``Civil liberties have just been hacked to pieces,´´ he said.

Abu-Ghazala's main foreign policy message -- that billions of dollars in annual U.S. aid to Israel should stop -- may win favor with voters who don't like foreign aid of any kind. But if polls are correct, he might not win many supporters with the centerpiece of his domestic agenda: the protection of civil liberties during the war on terrorism.

``Whether people like the message or not, I think it´s important that they hear it,´´ he said. Win or lose, Abu-Ghazala is doing something important, said Abdallah Al-Zuabi, national field director of the Arab-American Institute, which has sought to increase Arab-American participation in the political process for 15 years.

Recognition of the need for Arabs to get more involved in politics ``was a hundred times more after 9/11,´´ Al-Zuabi said, but at the same time many have felt too intimidated to speak out. ``To have Arab Americans running for Congress and talking about these issues will encourage other Arab Americans to do so also, so it has a positive effect.´´

Abu-Ghazala is taking a classic third-party approach and must know he can't win, said Jack Pitney, a professor of government at Claremont-McKenna College in Claremont. But his background could work for him.
``Even a more mainstream candidate with a lot of money wouldn´t stand much of a chance against Lantos,´´ Pitney said. ``He´s a respected Democratic incumbent in a Democratic district. The question is whether he can get a fair hearing for his point of view.´´

Lantos, who has a strong record on human rights, may be a friend of Israel, but that doesn't make him an enemy of Arabs or Arab Americans. In fact, when the FBI uncovered an alleged plan by a leader of the radical Jewish Defense League last week to bomb a Southern California mosque and an office of Arab American Rep. Darrell Issa, R-San Clemente, Lantos was at Issa's side to denounce the terrorist plot. Abu-Ghazala believes American policies in the Middle East -- of which Lantos is an influential architect -- are one of the root causes of rampant anti-Americanism. Those policies don't begin to justify the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, though, he said. Lantos holds a different view of the cause of the terrorist attacks.

``Osama bin Laden would have us believe that the United States´ continued presence in Saudi Arabia, our sanctions policy against Iraq or even our posture in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- a cause to which he only recently converted -- provoked and justified these terrorist acts. Let no one be deceived by the cynical and hateful rhetoric,´´ Lantos said at a congressional hearing Oct. 24.

``It is our open, democratic, inclusive, free way of life that is the true object of his hatred, he said. The terrorists hate America not for what we do, but for who we are."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: Torie
The Dems could run Osama bin Laden in this district and win.

Hmmm. It seems that the Libertarians could run OBL and certain people who post here -- on this thread -- repeatedly -- would vote for him.

41 posted on 01/04/2002 7:16:00 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ;mercuria
I share your assessment of Lantos.
Amazing how some would vote for him over a person favoring freedom and liberty, especially when there is no GOP challenger of any seriousness.

My basic philosophical political outlook is libertarian but I vote GOP in any case where there is a GOP candidate with any remote chance of winning. I believe in the GOP and its ability to effectively bring a traditional conservative government back to America.
I have in the past, and will continue to do so, blasted the official Libertarian party for running candidates that effectively put Democrats in power, e.g. GOP Sen. Slade Gorton in Washington state lost to leftist Maria Cantwell by less than the number of votes the Libertarian candidate siphoned off from Gorton. It is in these cases that I really get upset with the L.P. However the majority of libertarian principles are more closely aligned with the traditional conservatism that our country was founded upon.

There has been a lot of bashing of Americans of Arab descent, of Americans of the Islamic faith and of the Islamic religion on FR. I think it is unwise, politically, to have conservatism identified with racism and religious bigotry and hatred. To see people extolling Lantos over this LP candidate soley on his ethnicity and religious faith is a despicable situation.

42 posted on 01/04/2002 7:32:53 AM PST by luvzhottea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Libertarian: A republican with fetishes and vices they refuse to surrender.
43 posted on 01/04/2002 8:43:17 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Hadn't Tom Lantos committed suicide yet?
44 posted on 01/04/2002 8:48:18 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Bashing libertarians shames your heritige and shows your lack of common:

-------- Sense ----------

Always in the distance,
Beyond horizon's light.

- [to you anyway]

45 posted on 01/04/2002 9:16:15 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Pitiful, - even for a zero.
46 posted on 01/04/2002 9:18:29 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Bashing libertarians shames your heritige [sic]

You're so right:
AmishDude (L) -- now I'm perfect
AmishDude (R) -- now I'm evil
AmishDude (L) -- now I'm perfect again!

This is fun.

47 posted on 01/04/2002 9:20:17 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Had not? - No, I guess he hadn't, as of a few minutes ago anyway.

But we can hope.

48 posted on 01/04/2002 9:23:05 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
It will be interesting to see how an Arab-American will fare in this contest.
49 posted on 01/04/2002 9:24:29 AM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Hmmm. It seems that the Libertarians could run OBL and certain people who post here -- on this thread -- repeatedly -- would vote for him. p>
The Amish are famous for molding things out of dung, and this statement of yours certainly continues the tradition...

50 posted on 01/04/2002 9:25:21 AM PST by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
You are demonstating your mental age, I grant you that.

What else do you think you're doing ?

51 posted on 01/04/2002 9:25:53 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: The Green Goblin
The Amish are famous for molding things out of dung

Uh . . . yeah . . . sure . . . whatever.

52 posted on 01/04/2002 9:27:50 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
How can a Muslim really be a Libertarian?

The article only mentions that Abu-Ghazala is an attorney of Arab extraction. It does not mention his religion. He could very well be a Christian American.

53 posted on 01/04/2002 9:29:10 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
What else do you think you're doing ?

Mockery, I believe. It is not a subtle concept, that is true, but perhaps it was too subtle in this context.

54 posted on 01/04/2002 9:30:22 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
I predict about the same results as the Republican freeper had, that ran against lantos last time. [whats his name?]

Result? -- Total embarrassment.

55 posted on 01/04/2002 9:31:23 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Probably.
56 posted on 01/04/2002 9:35:36 AM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Dude, -- you need a --

-------- Sense --------

of humor in order to mock your betters.
-- You demonstrated your lack of that at #52.

Go back to Lancaster & raise a barn.

57 posted on 01/04/2002 9:36:29 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
I'd be behind anyone that unseated that Natzi Lantos
58 posted on 01/04/2002 9:37:20 AM PST by PRO 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
This race certainly has one thing going for it. Since the GOP candidate (assuming there is one) doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning, we ought to be spared the usual whining about the Libertarian candidate "causing" the Republican to lose.
59 posted on 01/04/2002 9:39:24 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mark Bahner
Equating US laws with the Sha'ria is one of the most ignorant statements anyone could possibly make.

You do know how the Sha'ria was derived don't you? It was a bunch of religious leaders over several hundred years reviewing cases at law and then asking them selves how Mohammed and his disciples would have decided the case and what principles were involved.

There was no element of deliberation - just guessing at the "feelings" of a bunch of guys long dead.

This eventually led Islam to a point of philosophical collapse. That's where it's at today.

60 posted on 01/04/2002 9:41:44 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson