Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRO discusses Tolkien's Conservatism
National Review ^ | 12-21-01 | John J. Miller

Posted on 12/21/2001 9:00:17 AM PST by Festa

Professor J. R. R. Tolkien was grading papers on a summer day in 1928 when he came upon a blank page in an exam book. Something inspired him to scribble a few words: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." The whole thing might have ended there, but it was only a beginning. "Names always generate a story in my mind," he explained later. "Eventually I thought I'd better find out what hobbits were like."

By now, millions of readers know what hobbits are like. They're the short, rustic, and unlikely heroes of the 20th century's best-loved book, The Lord of the Rings, as well as The Hobbit, a preceding story written mainly for children. They're about to become even more familiar: New Line Cinema has just released The Fellowship of the Ring, the first of an expensive trilogy of movies based on Tolkien's masterpiece. Before long, there probably won't be anybody left who doesn't have an inkling of what hobbits are like.

This will annoy certain people. If Tolkien has an army of fawning admirers, he also has a legion of fierce detractors. When readers chose The Lord of the Rings as "the greatest book of the century" in a 1997 poll by the British bookseller Waterstone's, the reaction from the critical class was quick and harsh. "Horrifying," gasped the Times Literary Supplement. "Novels don't come more fictional than that," sneered Germaine Greer. "The books that come from Tolkien's train are more or less what you would expect; flight from reality is their dominating characteristic."

If the new film version of The Lord of the Rings is seen as a flight from reality, then it has impeccable timing; after September 11, retreating into a fantasy realm of wizards and ringwraiths sounds like a welcome diversion. The movie does fulfill its simple promise of entertainment. Yet the book on which it is based offers the opposite of escapism. It speaks directly to some of the most fundamental concerns of this world: the nature of evil, the lure of power, and the duty of courage. In other words, it considers questions that definitely have not preoccupied the cultural elite for more than a generation.

At bottom, The Lord of the Rings is a deeply conservative book-a fact that may explain the hostility it faces from some quarters. Tolkien is often credited with the radical act of inventing the sword-and-sorcery epic, a genre of literature filed alongside science fiction in the bookstores. Surely he has many imitators; but he viewed himself in an altogether different light, as the heir to a grand tradition rather than the author of a new one. He called his Middle Earth a "sub-creation," partly in deference to the real Creator (Tolkien was a devout Catholic) but also because he owed so much to writers who lived centuries before him.

Knowing and understanding these writers was his day job as an Oxford University philologist-that is, an expert on the historical forms of language and literature. If Tolkien had never attempted fiction, he would still be remembered for his impressive scholarship: He penned what is perhaps the most influential essay ever written about Beowulf; many of the students enrolled in medieval-English-lit courses probably have encountered his popular translation of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Tolkien was a giant in his academic field, and left a mark that remains there today.

For Tolkien, though, the old stories were more than texts to analyze; they were a vital source of personal inspiration. Characters and events in The Lord of the Rings often echo the half-forgotten poems of the Anglo-Saxons, the Vikings, and their kin. There is hardly a proper noun in Tolkien's oeuvre that doesn't derive in some fashion from the ancient manuscripts of northern Europe. In The Lord of the Rings, for instance, Gandalf is the name of a good and great wizard; in the 13th-century Norse epic known as the Elder Edda, it is the name of a dwarf. Tolkien borrowed it to indulge his philologist's love of words, and also to lend linguistic authenticity to his project.

Tolkien intended to create an imaginary world that was fundamentally real, or at least potentially real. He did not want readers merely to suspend their disbelief in hobbits and elves; he wanted them to believe in their possibility. He devised whole languages and elaborate histories of Middle Earth long before he started writing the stories that would make use of them-they filled reams of notebooks that have been published posthumously as The Silmarillion and several other tomes. In the end, Middle Earth became a place that was so real to him that he compared actual places to it, rather than the other way around. (Venice, he once wrote, was "like a dream of Old Gondor.")

For the rest of us, of course, detailed accounts of wars between dwarves and orcs don't exactly enhance Middle Earth's realism. Yet Middle Earth is emphatically not another planet-it is our own world in a much earlier age. We have no specific knowledge of the era because it is so remote from us in time, though hints of it have seeped into our cultural memory through fairy tales and nursery rhymes. As a narrator in the movie puts it, "History became legend, legend became myth." In the book, Gandalf provides a fuller explanation when one of his companions asks about an odd creature they've met. "Is it so long since you listened to tales by a fireside? There are children in your land who, out of the twisted threads of story, could pick the answer to your question," says Gandalf. "Songs we have that tell of these things, but we are forgetting them, teaching them only to children, as careless custom."

Take the word "orc," the name given to a nasty race of goblin-like monsters. It appears in Beowulf as "orc-neas." Rendered into modern English from Beowulf's Old English (a language almost as foreign to our ears as Ger man), it means something like "demon-corpse," or perhaps "zombie." But the truth is that even scholars of Tolkien's caliber aren't sure of its precise definition or etymology-leaving open the delightful idea that therefar more to its meaning and background than what is dreamt of in our philosophy.

One of the most famous questions scholars have asked about Beowulf is whether it's a Christian poem; it seems to have been written by a Christian, but it deals with a pagan society. Likewise, there is no mention of God or even religion in Middle Earth. Yet Tolkien considered the book a reflection of his own faith. "The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision," wrote Tolkien in 1953. "The religious element is absorbed into the story and the symbolism." There are many examples of this, though readers frequently overlook them. A close examination of the appendices (there are six, plus indexes and maps) reveals a detail that goes unmentioned in the main narrative: The nine companions who comprise "the fellowship of the ring" begin their fateful mission on December 25 (Christmas), and their story climaxes exactly three months later, on March 25 (in the traditional English calendar, the date of the Fall of Man, the Annunciation, and the Crucifixion). Too much can be read into all this-Tolkien insisted that his book was not an allegory-but it does carry at least a limited meaning. Tom Shippey, Tolkien's finest interpreter, calls it "a kind of signature, a personal mark of piety."

The Lord of the Rings, then, is not an explicitly Christian work, but it is entirely consistent with Christianity. This is an essential element for Tolkien. As Joseph Pearce points out in his literary biography of Tolkien, "[his] Catholicism was not an opinion to which one subscribed but a reality to which one submitted." There is nothing in what he wrote that contradicts Christian belief. Middle Earth is un-Christian only in the sense that everything coming before Christ is un-Christian.

Tolkien does more than strive to avoid contradiction, however; he filled The Lord of the Rings with patchy foreshadowings of a Christian truth that had not yet revealed itself in fullness. Early on, when Frodo says he wishes someone would kill Gollum, a pitiful beast who haunts Tolkien's heroes, Gandalf objects. "Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment. For even the very wise cannot see all ends. I have not much hope that Gollum can be cured before he dies, but there is a chance of it," he says. "My heart tells me that he has some part to play yet, for good or ill, before the end." Indeed Gollum does, and he contributes to a medley of themes about knowledge, salvation, and eternity.

The Lord of the Rings may be read and enjoyed without reference to any theology whatsoever; it is a wonderful and well-told story. The movie is more or less faithful to it, but only gestures toward the deeper questions. It succeeds mainly as an exciting tale. Yet a full appreciation of Tolkien's accomplishment requires some sense of what lies behind the book.

The proclamation of any novel as the greatest of the 20th century is as much a burden as an accolade; it sets up the book for all kinds of sniping, lots of it undeserved. Yet it is impossible to deny the extraordinary fondness millions of ordinary readers have shown for The Lord of the Rings over the last five decades, and very difficult to disagree with the simple judgment of W. H. Auden: "If someone dislikes it, I shall never trust their literary judgment about anything again.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: tolkien
This may help to convince some freepers that Yes, this IS a must see movie. By the way Peter Jackson is upset at some Tax laws in New Zealand.....He says these taxes distort the incentives to grow New Zealands Movie Industry
1 posted on 12/21/2001 9:00:18 AM PST by Festa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aloha ronnie
"In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit."

In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit...freeper-frodo!

2 posted on 12/21/2001 9:38:49 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Festa
thanks, i had missed this on nro.
3 posted on 12/21/2001 9:45:15 AM PST by John Hines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Festa
Tolkien is deeply conservative, but not in any kind of belligerent or obnoxious way. And his conservatism goes back a long way. He hated automobiles and refused to ride in them. He hated machinery, modern architecture, etc., etc. He loved the country, woods, trees, fields, farms, cottages. He also loved beautiful cities, such as Gondolin, and he loved pubs.

There are reasons why he was immensely popular among hippies and back-to-nature freaks. One thing that says to me is that, although the environmental movement has been kidnapped by leftists, it is, or ought to be, a fundamentally a conservative thing. Too many Freepers want to repudiate environmentalism, when what we need to do is take it back from the leftists and the economic illiterates and restore it to what should be.

4 posted on 12/21/2001 10:12:07 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
To take more of a stewardship role, perhaps?

The error the left makes is to worship the creation, not the Creator. And in worshiping the Creator, repecting his works of his Hands. This to me is an honorable enviormentalism.

5 posted on 12/21/2001 11:01:29 AM PST by gracie1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cicero;gracie1
Count me in...
6 posted on 12/21/2001 11:13:30 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Don't mind that he liked fields, trees, etc.

Strange that he refused to ride in a car, or hated machinery. I didn't know this. This is typical of commune-loving hippy types who want to regress rather than progress.

Remember, Pol Pot from Cambodia who forced everyone out of the city to go "back to nature". Not a nice philosophy to not believe in human progress.

7 posted on 12/21/2001 11:14:50 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Festa
Here's a list compiled by Board members of Modern Library's (Random House) of the 100 Best Novels of the century, along with a list compiled by a count from a Reader's poll. Tolkien doesn't make the first list at all, but he comes in fourth in the second. Notice who tops the Reader's poll! (I am not a Rand fan at all.)

the board's list

1.   ULYSSES by James Joyce
2.   THE GREAT GATSBY by F. Scott Fitzgerald
3.   A PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST AS A YOUNG MAN by James Joyce
4.   LOLITA by Vladimir Nabokov
5.   BRAVE NEW WORLD by Aldous Huxley
6.   THE SOUND AND THE FURY by William Faulkner
7.   CATCH-22 by Joseph Heller
8.   DARKNESS AT NOON by Arthur Koestler
9.   SONS AND LOVERS by D.H. Lawrence
10.   THE GRAPES OF WRATH by John Steinbeck
11.   UNDER THE VOLCANO by Malcolm Lowry
12.   THE WAY OF ALL FLESH by Samuel Butler
13.   1984 by George Orwell
14.   I, CLAUDIUS by Robert Graves
15.   TO THE LIGHTHOUSE by Virginia Woolf
16.   AN AMERICAN TRAGEDY by Theodore Dreiser
17.   THE HEART IS A LONELY HUNTER by Carson McCullers
18.   SLAUGHTERHOUSE-FIVE by Kurt Vonnegut
19.   INVISIBLE MAN by Ralph Ellison
20.   NATIVE SON by Richard Wright
21.   HENDERSON THE RAIN KING by Saul Bellow
22.   APPOINTMENT IN SAMARRA by John O'Hara
23.   U.S.A. (trilogy) by John Dos Passos
24.   WINESBURG, OHIO by Sherwood Anderson
25.   A PASSAGE TO INDIA by E.M. Forster
26.   THE WINGS OF THE DOVE by Henry James
27.   THE AMBASSADORS by Henry James
28.   TENDER IS THE NIGHT by F. Scott Fitzgerald
29.   THE STUDS LONIGAN TRILOGY by James T. Farrell
30.   THE GOOD SOLDIER by Ford Madox Ford
31.   ANIMAL FARM by George Orwell
32.   THE GOLDEN BOWL by Henry James
33.   SISTER CARRIE by Theodore Dreiser
34.   A HANDFUL OF DUST by Evelyn Waugh
35.   AS I LAY DYING by William Faulkner
36.   ALL THE KING'S MEN by Robert Penn Warren
37.   THE BRIDGE OF SAN LUIS REY by Thornton Wilder
38.   HOWARDS END by E.M. Forster
39.   GO TELL IT ON THE MOUNTAIN by James Baldwin
40.   THE HEART OF THE MATTER by Graham Greene
41.   LORD OF THE FLIES by William Golding
42.   DELIVERANCE by James Dickey
43.   A DANCE TO THE MUSIC OF TIME (series) by Anthony Powell
44.   POINT COUNTER POINT by Aldous Huxley
45.   THE SUN ALSO RISES by Ernest Hemingway
46.   THE SECRET AGENT by Joseph Conrad
47.   NOSTROMO by Joseph Conrad
48.   THE RAINBOW by D.H. Lawrence
49.   WOMEN IN LOVE by D.H. Lawrence
50.   TROPIC OF CANCER by Henry Miller
51.   THE NAKED AND THE DEAD by Norman Mailer
52.   PORTNOY'S COMPLAINT by Philip Roth
53.   PALE FIRE by Vladimir Nabokov
54.   LIGHT IN AUGUST by William Faulkner
55.   ON THE ROAD by Jack Kerouac
56.   THE MALTESE FALCON by Dashiell Hammett
57.   PARADE'S END by Ford Madox Ford
58.   THE AGE OF INNOCENCE by Edith Wharton
59.   ZULEIKA DOBSON by Max Beerbohm
60.   THE MOVIEGOER by Walker Percy
61.   DEATH COMES FOR THE ARCHBISHOP by Willa Cather
62.   FROM HERE TO ETERNITY by James Jones
63.   THE WAPSHOT CHRONICLES by John Cheever
64.   THE CATCHER IN THE RYE by J.D. Salinger
65.   A CLOCKWORK ORANGE by Anthony Burgess
66.   OF HUMAN BONDAGE by W. Somerset Maugham
67.   HEART OF DARKNESS by Joseph Conrad
68.   MAIN STREET by Sinclair Lewis
69.   THE HOUSE OF MIRTH by Edith Wharton
70.   THE ALEXANDRIA QUARTET by Lawrence Durell
71.   A HIGH WIND IN JAMAICA by Richard Hughes
72.   A HOUSE FOR MR BISWAS by V.S. Naipaul
73.   THE DAY OF THE LOCUST by Nathanael West
74.   A FAREWELL TO ARMS by Ernest Hemingway
75.   SCOOP by Evelyn Waugh
76.   THE PRIME OF MISS JEAN BRODIE by Muriel Spark
77.   FINNEGANS WAKE by James Joyce
78.   KIM by Rudyard Kipling
79.   A ROOM WITH A VIEW by E.M. Forster
80.   BRIDESHEAD REVISITED by Evelyn Waugh
81.   THE ADVENTURES OF AUGIE MARCH by Saul Bellow
82.   ANGLE OF REPOSE by Wallace Stegner
83.   A BEND IN THE RIVER by V.S. Naipaul
84.   THE DEATH OF THE HEART by Elizabeth Bowen
85.   LORD JIM by Joseph Conrad
86.   RAGTIME by E.L. Doctorow
87.   THE OLD WIVES' TALE by Arnold Bennett
88.   THE CALL OF THE WILD by Jack London
89.   LOVING by Henry Green
90.   MIDNIGHT'S CHILDREN by Salman Rushdie
91.   TOBACCO ROAD by Erskine Caldwell
92.   IRONWEED by William Kennedy
93.   THE MAGUS by John Fowles
94.   WIDE SARGASSO SEA by Jean Rhys
95.   UNDER THE NET by Iris Murdoch
96.   SOPHIE'S CHOICE by William Styron
97.   THE SHELTERING SKY by Paul Bowles
98.   THE POSTMAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE by James M. Cain
99.   THE GINGER MAN by J.P. Donleavy
100.   THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS by Booth Tarkington

the readers' list

1.   ATLAS SHRUGGED by Ayn Rand
2.   THE FOUNTAINHEAD by Ayn Rand
3.   BATTLEFIELD EARTH by L. Ron Hubbard
4.   THE LORD OF THE RINGS by J.R.R. Tolkien
5.   TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD by Harper Lee
6.   1984 by George Orwell
7.   ANTHEM by Ayn Rand
8.   WE THE LIVING by Ayn Rand
9.   MISSION EARTH by L. Ron Hubbard
10.   FEAR by L. Ron Hubbard
11.   ULYSSES by James Joyce
12.   CATCH-22 by Joseph Heller
13.   THE GREAT GATSBY by F. Scott Fitzgerald
14.   DUNE by Frank Herbert
15.   THE MOON IS A HARSH MISTRESS by Robert Heinlein
16.   STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND by Robert Heinlein
17.   A TOWN LIKE ALICE by Nevil Shute
18.   BRAVE NEW WORLD by Aldous Huxley
19.   THE CATCHER IN THE RYE by J.D. Salinger
20.   ANIMAL FARM by George Orwell
21.   GRAVITY'S RAINBOW by Thomas Pynchon
22.   THE GRAPES OF WRATH by John Steinbeck
23.   SLAUGHTERHOUSE FIVE by Kurt Vonnegut
24.   GONE WITH THE WIND by Margaret Mitchell
25.   LORD OF THE FLIES by William Golding
26.   SHANE by Jack Schaefer
27.   TRUSTEE FROM THE TOOLROOM by Nevil Shute
28.   A PRAYER FOR OWEN MEANY by John Irving
29.   THE STAND by Stephen King
30.   THE FRENCH LIEUTENANT'S WOMAN by John Fowles
31.   BELOVED by Toni Morrison
32.   THE WORM OUROBOROS by E.R. Eddison
33.   THE SOUND AND THE FURY by William Faulkner
34.   LOLITA by Vladimir Nabokov
35.   MOONHEART by Charles de Lint
36.   ABSALOM, ABSALOM! by William Faulkner
37.   OF HUMAN BONDAGE by W. Somerset Maugham
38.   WISE BLOOD by Flannery O'Connor
39.   UNDER THE VOLCANO by Malcolm Lowry
40.   FIFTH BUSINESS by Robertson Davies
41.   SOMEPLACE TO BE FLYING by Charles de Lint
42.   ON THE ROAD by Jack Kerouac
43.   HEART OF DARKNESS by Joseph Conrad
44.   YARROW by Charles de Lint
45.   AT THE MOUNTAINS OF MADNESS by H.P. Lovecraft
46.   ONE LONELY NIGHT by Mickey Spillane
47.   MEMORY AND DREAM by Charles de Lint
48.   TO THE LIGHTHOUSE by Virginia Woolf
49.   THE MOVIEGOER by Walker Percy
50.   TRADER by Charles de Lint
51.   THE HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY by Douglas Adams
52.   THE HEART IS A LONELY HUNTER by Carson McCullers
53.   THE HANDMAID'S TALE by Margaret Atwood
54.   BLOOD MERIDIAN by Cormac McCarthy
55.   A CLOCKWORK ORANGE by Anthony Burgess
56.   ON THE BEACH by Nevil Shute
57.   A PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST AS A YOUNG MAN by James Joyce
58.   GREENMANTLE by Charles de Lint
59.   ENDER'S GAME by Orson Scott Card
60.   THE LITTLE COUNTRY by Charles de Lint
61.   THE RECOGNITIONS by William Gaddis
62.   STARSHIP TROOPERS by Robert Heinlein
63.   THE SUN ALSO RISES by Ernest Hemingway
64.   THE WORLD ACCORDING TO GARP by John Irving
65.   SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES by Ray Bradbury
66.   THE HAUNTING OF HILL HOUSE by Shirley Jackson
67.   AS I LAY DYING by William Faulkner
68.   TROPIC OF CANCER by Henry Miller
69.   INVISIBLE MAN by Ralph Ellison
70.   THE WOOD WIFE by Terri Windling
71.   THE MAGUS by John Fowles
72.   THE DOOR INTO SUMMER by Robert Heinlein
73.   ZEN AND THE ART OF MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE by Robert Pirsig
74.   I, CLAUDIUS by Robert Graves
75.   THE CALL OF THE WILD by Jack London
76.   AT SWIM-TWO-BIRDS by Flann O'Brien
77.   FARENHEIT 451 by Ray Bradbury
78.   ARROWSMITH by Sinclair Lewis
79.   WATERSHIP DOWN by Richard Adams
80.   NAKED LUNCH by William S. Burroughs
81.   THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER by Tom Clancy
82.   GUILTY PLEASURES by Laurell K. Hamilton
83.   THE PUPPET MASTERS by Robert Heinlein
84.   IT by Stephen King
85.   V. by Thomas Pynchon
86.   DOUBLE STAR by Robert Heinlein
87.   CITIZEN OF THE GALAXY by Robert Heinlein
88.   BRIDESHEAD REVISITED by Evelyn Waugh
89.   LIGHT IN AUGUST by William Faulkner
90.   ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST by Ken Kesey
91.   A FAREWELL TO ARMS by Ernest Hemingway
92.   THE SHELTERING SKY by Paul Bowles
93.   SOMETIMES A GREAT NOTION by Ken Kesey
94.   MY ANTONIA by Willa Cather
95.   MULENGRO by Charles de Lint
96.   SUTTREE by Cormac McCarthy
97.   MYTHAGO WOOD by Robert Holdstock
98.   ILLUSIONS by Richard Bach
99.   THE CUNNING MAN by Robertson Davies
100.   THE SATANIC VERSES by Salman Rushdie

8 posted on 12/21/2001 12:58:54 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beckett
Wow! I counted seven of Robert Heinlein's books in the readers' list, but none in the critics' list.

Since I'm a Heinlein fan, I guess I'll settle for being one of the great unwashed. (wink and a smile)

9 posted on 12/21/2001 1:08:29 PM PST by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Festa
Tolkien sounds like a writer worth reading, and not just another Hummel collector, garden gnome fancier or plush animal fetishist.

It's nice that National Review Online has established that Tolkien was conservative. Maybe someday someone will do the same for National Review Online.

That may be unfair, but Tolkien's kind of technophobic, stick in the mud conservatism is a far cry from the Washington- and Manhattan-centered imperialism of today's National Review. Which is better is open to debate, but Miller makes himself silly if he claims to be an heir to Tolkien's worldview.

10 posted on 12/21/2001 3:25:19 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Don't mind that he liked fields, trees, etc.

Strange that he refused to ride in a car, or hated machinery. I didn't know this. This is typical of commune-loving hippy types who want to regress rather than progress.

Remember, Pol Pot from Cambodia who forced everyone out of the city to go "back to nature". Not a nice philosophy to not believe in human progress.

Whoah, there. Not so fast. The Bolsheviks in the USSR and the Communists in China both believed in human progress, and in technology, and they killed a lot more people than Pol Pot did.

In any case, Tolkien's conservatism was that of the classic belief in a golden age: the very opposite of the idea of progress, in that the further one got from the golden age, the more degraded and corrupt the age became...and there was no going back to the golden age (unlike Pol Pot, who, like the other communists, did believe one could create, or "return", to a golden age). Tolkien's conservative pessimism should never be compared to a Pol Pot; it is the very opposite of any kind of utopianism.

Moreover, Tolkien was against not just modernity but against force and tyranny in general (which he associated with modernity). He was not about to force anyone to give up technology; as he puts it somewhere in the Two Towers, where Gandalf and Treebeard are discussing Saruman: Treebeard says that he feels sorry for any caged thing, and might act in a similar way to Saruman if his own forest home had been destroyed and he was trapped, to which Gandalf responds that Treebeard had never plotted to cover the earth with his forests and to choke off all other kinds of life.

That's pretty much Tolkien's worldview: it is not just that he does not care for the technology, but that he dislikes the modern tendency to push it into all realms of life and to transform the entire world into it's own image, no matter who objects and no matter how it (modernity) tends to smother all differences and to turn the world into a single, vast, homogenous sameness.

Comparing this kind of resistance to modernity to Pol Pot is a prime example of what is wrong with progress-worshipping modern "conservatism".

11 posted on 12/23/2001 3:26:01 AM PST by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolkien
Linking
12 posted on 01/12/2002 6:47:31 PM PST by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonah Hex
Wow! I counted seven of Robert Heinlein's books in the readers' list, but none in the critics' list.

I went a step further. There are at least 19 science fiction or fantasy novels I recognized in the readers' list and only one in the critics' list. (Clockwork Orange, which is science fiction mostly in setting.)

Interesting that the critics' have such little interest in an entire genre that means so much to so many readers.

BTW, I thought it was neat that Heinlein's top-rated book was The Moon is a Harsh Mistress. It's my personal favorite, too.

13 posted on 01/12/2002 7:00:01 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson