[El Sordo]

How on earth did the Tourist Guy get onto the sound stage? : )

[ttdriver]

Let me guess...Geraldo????

[Jewels1091]

He's everywhere, he's everywhere!!! Maybe he can find bin laden now...

[Attillathehon]

It's a fake! You can tell because there are no shadows from tourist guy.

[isthisnickcool]

Is that Inspector Callahan back there?

[kayak]

bttt

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Thats not Tourist Guy.

That's Freeper Inspector Harry Callahan.

[r9etb]

Better: Instead of in the background, why not have him reflected in the visor?

[ramdalesh]

Tourist guy came to the wrong speak-easy that's for sure.

[Charles Henrickson]

"That's one small step for a guy,
one giant leap for a tourist."

[Cuttnhorse]

How funny!...I have a friend who totally bought into the WTC tourist guy photo and gave me a rough time when I said it was a fake. So now I send her every "tourist guy" photo I can find. She has since called UNCLE, but I still send them anyway...hee hee.

[Thinkin' Gal]

[Digger]

I assume that this is an original copy picture except for the shield photo. Interestingly since their is very little atmosphere in comparison to the earth that there is so much diffusion of light away from the astroNOT. Observe a picture w/o an atmosphere & it should have a more evenly dispersion of light away from the center. Naw, it couldn't be a fake.

[Texaggie79]

[6ppc]

Tourist Guy Rising

[petuniasevan]

Astronaut: "Honey, I think I remember where I left the keys!"

[Brett66]

Notice how the light on the astronaut is brighter than on the tourist guy. Also notice how tourist guy seems so large to be standing behind a hill that looks to be at least 100 ft. away. This is the smoking gun we've been waiting for, NASA has lied to us for over 32 years!

[Brett66]

I've collected more evidence! Read on in amazement!:

Heroic images or NASA fraud? At last we have the conclusive proof! The image on the left clearly shows the supposed 25,000 of thrust generated by the lunar lander to arrest its descent. Yet in the image on the right, where is the giant crater this would have created? Looks like the complex web of NASA lies is about to unravel!

[mikrofon]

PING

[Brett66]

NASA Announces Plans For A 2006 Lunar Landing

Previously unreleased photo of the moon landing "set" inside a NASA hangar.

"We're going to the moon for real this time," said Kirk. "There will be no soundstages or doubled-up footage. We really are going to go to the moon."

After Kirk confirmed that NASA's 1969 moon landing was a fake, he made no apologies on their behalf for misleading the public.

"We embellished the first moon landing at the height of the Cold War and we had absolutely no moral qualms about doing it," stated Krik. "We gave America an edge in the 'world view' with our moon landing. We believe that it was a fantastic piece of P.R.(public relations) for America, Americans, and capitalism--when we needed it most."

Kirk conceded that there was one regret about the 1969 moon landing facade. NASA's only disappointment about the faked moon landing was in the gross underestimation of the American public.

"I really think that we should have done a better job in faking the first moon landing. When we look back, It's really kind of embarrassing how poor a job was done in 1969. We didn't draw the star constellations correctly in the background; we simply doubled the footage in slow motion and thought that everyone would believe that everything was exactly half as slow on the moon's surface; we tried to make the public believe that we would spend 30 billion dollars to send a couple of astronauts to the moon to hit a bucket of golf balls and drive around in a lunar dune buggy. And, we used the exact camera angles that were used in the 1968 film, 2001: A Space Odyssey."

"I'm sure half of the people watching our historic 'live' broadcast of the 'first man on the moon' were having feelings of déjà vu," added Kirk. "It was just ridiculous."

"After the 1969 moon landing, NASA was questioned and mocked by astronomers and physicists--even slapped in the face by Hollywood with the movie Capricorn One," said Kirk. "We promise that this is not going to happen again. We regret and apologize for our poor job of portraying the 1969 'moon landing' and we plan to make it up to the public by going there 'for real' this time."

"We are fully prepared to really go to the moon in 2006 and do intensive geological and atmospheric testing," said Kirk. "We want to know everything about the moon's mineral make-up and its structure."

"And we're going to leave the golf clubs at home," Kirk quipped.