Good to see you in print again. I don't think I am going to get to excited over this "article"(?). I read and then re-read the article. It has me scratching my head as I can't find it from the source. It also has a byline crediting multiple sources including Reuters.
The line that really caused me to scratch my head was the last in the article ...
"Walker has told U.S. authorities he was a member of al-Qaida, the militant network led by Osama bin Laden that Bush blames for the Sept. 11 attacks, Pentagon officials said."
Libs and other agents provacateur always tip their hand somewhere in their words. "Bush Blames"? What part of the planet does the pinhead that wrote that line live? He/She/It more than likely are part of the crowd that believes this whole episode in our history lays at the feet of Anton Scalia and the SC.
The case involving Johnny Bin Walker is breaking new ground in American jurisprudence and having been around long enough to watch our legal system devolve into a cesspool full of the bottom feeding beings know as "lawyers", I am certain of only one thing: This case will have more turns than the OJ trial before it is over.
The case has been out of the Presidents hands since before it began. But most importantly I wouldn't get too excited over the ranting on this thread based upon dubious sources at best.
Again, blessed Holiday Seasons greetings from an old #Free_Republic partner.