To: moonman
Yes. But please see #12. Author is unclear about term of expenditures.Why? Misleading. Most will tend to think of it as $350 per annum. Any of these bills, when spread out over ten years are not realistic. Prices will vary, as they say. Politicians will come and go. Farm belt losing clout. Ten years hence? Far less powerful than today.
14 posted on
12/12/2001 6:13:06 PM PST by
donozark
To: donozark
Point well taken ... thanks :)
15 posted on
12/12/2001 6:16:07 PM PST by
moonman
To: donozark
US dollar sign?? Jeez, talk about cultural imperialism, its a NZ source reporting in NZ dollars; and the article clearly states that the spending is over ten years. As for questioning Scoop.co.nz as a reputable source, its alot more reputable than some of the sources quoted on FR with alarming regularity, ie Drudge, WorldNetDaily and NewsMax.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson