Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/03/2001 11:29:22 AM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: real saxophonist
A car was speeding.
A car was ticketed.
Point made.

-Strelnikoff

2 posted on 12/03/2001 11:38:20 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Darth Sidious
bump
4 posted on 12/03/2001 11:52:54 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Darth Sidious
bump
5 posted on 12/03/2001 11:53:56 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
Paintball guns are a relaxing recreational pass-time.
8 posted on 12/03/2001 1:07:44 PM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
I've got a question regarding photo radar: Isn't it dependent on your having a front plate?
Moral: Remove front license plate before driving through Boulder!
9 posted on 12/03/2001 1:10:58 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
So...with a speeder camera, you gotta prove yourself innocent ?

Takes me back to the days when a group of lads on my street invested in a noisey 125 CC dirt bike, which they ran for hours on end up and down my formerly quiet street.
One nice morning, after a month of this, the lads rolled the dirt bike out for a kick start, only to find it vandalized--every cable had been neatly clipped with side cutters and removed--the MASKED AVENGER had struck !

We never knew who the masked man was. But we were glad he stepped forward and put a stop to such arrogance, once and or all. With a little luck, maybe he'll make an appearance in Boulder.

11 posted on 12/03/2001 1:17:23 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
"We compare the photo on the driver's license with the close-up photo-radar picture," said Jill Spencer, a legal assistant in the city attorney's office. If the two photos do not match, the ticket is dismissed, she said.

OK........I guess I'm OK since my hair was long and I had a goatee when my license pic was taken, now I'm clean-shaven with short hair. Ha!

The attorney's office does not keep statistics on complaints, but only a handful of them, like Philbrick's, involve a ticket sent to the wrong car owner, she said.

Don't keep statistics? Wouldn't want anyone to really know how bad you piss people off, now would you? Might lose that cushy government job.

If that is the case then exactly how do you know that 'only a handful' of tickets involve this type of complaint. Don't you just love liberal (il)logic?

12 posted on 12/03/2001 1:18:59 PM PST by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
When the were talking about photo radar in New Jersey, Jim Gearhart of NJ101.5 suggested the Groucho Marx glasses with the attached nose and mustache.
17 posted on 12/03/2001 2:20:58 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
“There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt.” -- Ayn Rand
23 posted on 12/03/2001 6:26:22 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
I was in a neighboring city in Colorado. I got one of those photo radar tickets. The whole photo radar system is a scam. They are not moving violations, in which they can take your driver's license or points from your driver's licenses. They are regarded the same as parking violations. In fact, the only meat in the ordinance at all, has to do with sending the unpaid violations to a credit agency so that if you do not pay them you will have bad credit.

I didn't get the ticket until one month later. Try to remember where you were and what you were doing a month ago. They did not send any picture with it, just an explanation of where to view the picture. "Between the hours of 10:00 am and 4:00 pm Mondays-Fridays. If you feel you should not have received the ticket after viewing the picture, you have to make an appointment with the City attorney or take it to court. Well that was two days off work to find out if I owed the money or not. They did give a location "in the 200 block of College avenue".

I went by the location and realized that just in front of the van the speed limit increases 10 miles per hour. I had always been taught that you begin increasing or decreasing your speed when you see the sign, so that when you pass the sign you are at the correct speed. A point some little camera in an unmarked van doesn't take into consideration.

At any rate, because of my business schedule, I didn't have time to persue it before leaving town. I had not made up my mind whether or not to take the two days off to fight the ticket. When I got back a second notice was waiting for me. This time it stated that if I didn't pay it I would be issued a summons to appear at court. I was again leaving town for business and decided to wait until I got back. I decided that I should at least have been given as much time as they took to first send the ticket.

When I was called out of town again, I thought "screw it", I just pay the 40 dollars and be done with it. Next time (if there is a next time) I will fight the darn thing.

When I got back to town, a letter was waiting for me. Inside was my check, and a letter stating that they did not have the authority to summon me because I did not live inside the city limits and their officers couldn't issue summons outside of the city limits. Therefore, since I had not paid the ticket within the 45 days, they could not pursue it.

In other words, this is a revenue generating thing for the cities that use it. After all, if they were really interested in the safety of the citizens they wouldn't wait 30 days to stop someone from speeding or running a red light.

26 posted on 12/04/2001 4:56:11 AM PST by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
The Eye in the Sky... looking at *You* - thread II
28 posted on 12/06/2001 2:17:41 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson