I thought you'd be over there, hanging out with eschoir like you usually do.
I'm just posting a couple of general questions on 'conservative' views to anyone who remains before I get some shut-eye:
I'm using 'conservative' deliberately here instead of pubbie (neo, paleo, statist, whatever the "classes" are today), libertarian, etc.
If it is generally believed that the first amendment protects freedom of speech and the press, then does it necessarily follow that a private individual or company engaged in any speech related activity must provide an outlet for opposing views? If so, then must that individual bear the financial obligation of distributing opposing viewpoints?
May I choose, of my own free understanding, to give money to any individual or company so that they may use it as they please?