You know, I'll do just that when I get some time. Or maybe I'll bump it over at our place and you can drop in and discuss it with us. It will probably be right after Jim gets around to answering all the questions I've posed for him to enable the FReepers to evaluate his credibility. That was a generous invitation that grew into quite a fundraising opportunity!
And thanks for asking!
http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/freerep/19991029rob.htm
Re: Chapter activity, it reads in pertinent part:
55. Neither Free Republic or I have any connection with the association which calls itself FreeRepublic Southern California Chapter beyond the fact that the members of FreeRepublic Southern California Chapter are "fans" and users of the Free Republic web site. I have received no money, dues or payments from the Free Republic Southern California Chapter. The "Free Republic" referred to in Paragraph 15 of the Declaration of Heather L Wayland In Support of Plaintiffs Motion For Partial Summary Judgment is not the Free Republic which is the defendant in this action. Neither I nor Free Republic have any connection with or control over the FreeRepublic Southern California Chapter referred to by Ms. Wayland.
Is not the FR Network now comprised of all the FR Chapters? If so, is not the Southern California chapter a part of the FR Network?
What relationship does Jim or FR have, if any, with any chapter or the Free Republic Network? Explain, if you can, how Jim and FR have no connection.
Thanks!