Replies

The report, which still hasn't been published yet in the Federal Register, shows all these anomalies and I'm glad you didn't blame the investigation team. However, blaming the board itself would also be a tough sell since there are 5 members of the board of which 2 must be members of the party that is currently not occupying the White House. You would think that any shenanigans regarding the evidence or the probable cause would 1) cause the minority members of the board to run screaming to Congress and 2) cause the technical team to resign enmass. We didn't see that and I find it highly unlikely - given the current state of out-of-control partisianship - that there could be a mass collusion effort.

As I said earlier, I will wait until the report is published in the Register.

Party membership is no control on corruptness. Both sides of our Congress are equally greedy in favoring big money lobbyists. I could agree with a cover-up if the shooter were a British submarine. We need their cooperation, especially today. But history demands that the truth be told eventually. I hope to be still vertical when that occurs. There is an alternate approach if the truth is to be withheld. That would be to state that the reason involves national security concerns and an official report will follow at a later date. But if the truth were withheld because Bill Clinton was up for reelection while facing a war hero while he was the CinC during a military screwup and was known as a draftdodger, Bob Dole could have easily taken some votes away from Clinton. It would be difficult for Bob Dole to not have known the facts in any case, though. If a bona fide reason existed, I would tend to lean toward a foreign shooter of the missile during a CEC. British sub involvement in the shooting of cruise missiles over So.CA is history and a shooting of a KKV is conceivable as well. The submarine shown as the 30-knot target was a modern one with a large diameter stealth propeller design. Its usage of modern weapons would be compatible. I have to guess that the missile guidance system was locked onto the sled in the beginning but was later drawn off by the higher heat coming from a climbing B747. Some witness data was that an object made a hard turn and flew in a zigzag course before closing in on the B747. This agrees with the offset of the plane's location relative to a straight line drawn from the sub to the sled. The hard turn would have been to an Easternly direction.

If publishing in the National Register is the controlling criteria, when is this to occur? The board members may be as brain dead as the sheeple in this matter. The evidence is in the NTSB report and they likely have no inkling of what it says. If anyone were to object, they had good reason to do so in Bal'mer when no witnesses were called and the Boeing representatives sat with their fingers up their butts. That was a kangaroo court in the finest.