It never ceases to amaze me that the most vocal critics of the NTSB and the TWA800 investigation know the least about what they are talking about. It's no wonder you think the NTSB is lying. You can't even interpret a simple data chart! The sad thing is, you blame the NTSB for you lack of analytical skill. The elevation cuts on I-9 don't even come from Boston Center. They come from an Air Route Surveillance Radar. Not even surveillance radars on AWACS have the kind of elevation accuracy you insist the NTSB is lying about. Sporadic P-3 primary returns?!!? Heck, I'm surprised they saw it at all.
If you are truly serious about your ridiculous theory, you owe it to yourself to do some research into our countries ATC system and the capability of its radars. You have got a lot of nerve to accuse me of lying about a subject you cannot even talk intelligently about.
Finally, you STILL haven't told me if I'm looking at the right thing on page 42. Are you afraid of your information?
Most of us just call that 'a transponder' now since, in reality, it isn't *used* for that 'IFF' function anymore (it's early *roots* may have been in that area - but that's been awhile now).
We used to have a poster self-identified as "FormerLurker" who would call it "IFF ..." all the time. Is there a connection here?