Although he didnt testify, we had to hear on and on from Johnie Cockroach about how they had a "Nobel Peace Prize" winner (cockroach was too stupid to recall that Mullis was a Chemistry Nobel Laureate) to testify on how "disputable" the evidence was. I followed that case very, very closely (Im a trained Ph.D. Molecular Biologist, who lived in L.A at the time) and OJ was a guilty as you can get.
Have you read the Kelly - Wearne book, and if so, do you have a comment on it?
Kelly and Wearne aren't very "technical", could you suggest a book that gives an explanation of the DNA comparison procedures used in forensic (so-called) science?
I use "so called" because the primary objective of forensic scince is not "objective knowledge" but nailing the perp.