[brat]

I'd be just a tad suspicious if I was a property owner there. Are they trying to catch a rancher doing something UNPC so they can grab his land??? (The land grabs out West are out of control.) Could this be part of it? Why does the gov. want it? Why does the UN want it? Anyone got a clue???

[Got a right to Life? . . Huh?]

There was no apparent problem with the wilderness signs in the area of John DeLong's ranch. The D.O.I. must have a particular interest in Mr. Delong, his property, or the local activities framed in the camera's view. The sign surveillance story is more than likely bull. Who knows what they're up to? They may want Delong's property to extend the wilderness area. All they need to do is capture the image of an endangered species and he is shut down, bankrupt.