regards
I wrote him a letter not long ago when he criticized President Bush's speech after the Sept. 11 attack. If I recall correctly, Rosenberg gushed about how much better Clintoon would have been giving such a speech and said that President Bush doesn't "fill the screen." It's all about the show in Hollywood.
From my post on a previous thread:
Just in case you missed it, here is a short quote from Howard Rosenberg's attack piece in the Los Angeles Times on September 14, 2001. Since we are under court order not to post the FULL TEXT of the drivel in the L.A.T. - Thank God! - I am also posting a link, which will expire very soon. (Too bad Rosenberg's "hate speech" will not expire with it!)
From Bush's Image Fails to Fill the Screen:
"...Even his body language is troubling, as when TV cameras captured him returning to the White House late Tuesday after being shuttled about on Air Force One after an alert that the presidential residence and plane also had been possible targets of that day's terrorism. The Bush we saw, walking alone, appeared almost to be slinking guiltily across the lawn.
Bush has seemed almost like a little boy at times --a kid with freckles wishing he were somewhere else--when instead a national anchorman was needed to speak believably with confidence about the state of the union during one of its darkest hours..."
(This attack was published while the bodies from the Twin Towers were not yet cold.)
Are you angry enough yet to FReep him?
And the L.A. Times?
Rosenberg must've been an admirer of Willie's nose...