Would you please go back to my last post and compare what I wrote to your response? Did I say there was no explosion? Did I say there were no witnesses who said there was an explosion? No. I said an explosion does not mean bomb or missile. I also said witnesses statements were in conflict. That fact is, we don't know!
The only explanation you are going to accept is one of sabotage. Even if exhaustive evidence is presented to the contrary, you will claim to know 'the real truth'.