[t-shirt]

Is that how you win an argument? By calling me a mispelled "Stoopid" like a preteen little girl?--You call me a name and you win?

Now tell me is this a theory?--"And how much do you want to bet these are union employees who must be laid off in reverse seniority order"
--Trust but Verify

I'll answer, no it's not.

Anymore than this one statement by me is:

"And how much you want to bet they are laying off a lot of the older, higher-paid, higher-skilled American citizen maintainance, baggage handlers, and security folks, while keeping the lower paid less skilled foriegn nationals--many of whom are Middle Easterners."

For either to be a theory we'd have had to have laid out what we thought caused the accident with atleast some evidence supporting it. Neither statement did so.

[Trust but Verify]

OK, STUPID. Better? I'll just ask you whether you understand that in order for your statement to be true, you'd have to beleive that the airlines can arbitrarily lay off the best, most senior and hence, highest paid employees given the fact there are union contracts which would forbid that.