Skip to comments.
If New York Is Nuked
NewsMax ^
| November 9, 2001
| Christopher Ruddy
Posted on 11/09/2001 2:18:51 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-145 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator
Comment #102 Removed by Moderator
Comment #103 Removed by Moderator
To: Nate505
It would seem that the technical difficulties in hijacking planes are not as complex as the technical difficulties of smuggling nuclear weapons into the US and detonating them, at least to me...
I think you're right about that. For me, hijacking a plane would be something I couldn't do. Nukes neither! Even if I had the inclination and the nerve, I think Murphy's law wouuld work against me! LOL! (But I don't have either of those either!)
To: MeeknMing
Ok, you're one less person we have to worry about :)
105
posted on
11/09/2001 12:43:42 PM PST
by
Nate505
To: buckalfa
The true power of militant Islam is not what they can do to us, but rather what they can deny to us. Think about that next time you fill up your gas tank, turn on a light, or heat up your house.
Well said, I am disappointed that the administration has not made energy self sufficiency part of their agenda against terrorism.
I hope you're not UNDERestimatin' GWB now are ya? Don't count this option out! Remember, he campaigned on ANWR! ! ! You can bet, he hasn't forgotten! And IMHO, we have BADLY needed an Energy Policy for 30 years!
He's fightin' a WAR right now, so this is simply in the Queue waitin' for the right time to be put before the DIMocRATS who will quickly sign up to it. . .
To: Nate505; Sidebar Moderator
Comment #92 Removed by Moderator
Anybody see this post? Why was it removed?? Just curious. . .
To: MaeWest
I believe he is refering with sarcasm to the propaganda that was put out by the peace movement. In order to advance their political agenda they promoted despair and a false sense of helplessness ('In case of attack, we're all gonna die! Give up, give up now!'). Their goal was to terrify people into supporting them.
Excellent post there, good FReeper friend! ;-)
To: MeeknMing
Also, thanks to Clinton, our civil defense shelters were shut down and the supplies sold off. Thanks Bill.
To: lawdude
And your scientific basis for this totally stupid remark is? Not real tuned into sarcasm are you?
110
posted on
11/09/2001 3:10:37 PM PST
by
pgkdan
To: pgkdan
"Not real tuned into sarcasm are you?"
I saw no hint of sarcasm. As a physicist, I take scientific comments seriously and that one showed gross ignorance, not sarcasm.
Sorry if I get a bit intense about something so trivial as the security of the country/world!
111
posted on
11/09/2001 3:31:04 PM PST
by
lawdude
To: MeeknMing
"Daddy, what's an Arab?"
To: MeeknMing
It was removed at the request of the person who posted it.
To: MeeknMing
bump
114
posted on
11/09/2001 4:40:36 PM PST
by
Roberts
To: MeeknMing
Anybody see this post? Why was it removed?? Just curious. . . I asked them to remove it. It was just a double post, the exact same thing I posted in #91....double posts just get on my nevers personally, especially when I do them.
115
posted on
11/09/2001 5:37:20 PM PST
by
Nate505
To: Nate505
double posts just get on my nevers personally, especially when I do them.
Ah! Ok, thanks! I noticed another one:Comment #102 Removed by Moderator
I wonder what that was about?. . .
To: operation clinton cleanup
They already did-- have you ever heard of immigration?
To: MeeknMing
More abuse.
To: ASA Vet
Please explain. There is a cute little 17 year old cheerleader at our highschool. She is a foreign exchange student from Danmark. How did she get to be a threat worthy of deportation? She's here on a Visa, and is an alien, so according to your rant she is suspect, should have her visa revoked, and expelled to save our nation. --- ASA Vet
I didn't rant. I linked. One of the links is to a discussion based on the idea of "revoking all visas". I listed that link in my post because there are many posts and points-of-view in that discussion. I personally subscribe to the idea of a Terrorist Deportation Plan, which would send all visitors home if they are from certain suspect countries. Last I checked Denmark (correcting your spelling) is not harboring terrorists. And if it were, I doubt if they would be blond Danish people, but rather, swarthy middle-easterns visiting Denmark for travel and a bit of terrorism.
I believe strongly in profiling, not just at the airport security checks, but at the visa window and the INS line.
The action I'm supporting would be focused on specific groups, but failing that, if the USA can't get smart enough to focus on those groups, I would accept a blanket ban on all visas, as much as it would inconvenience innocent people like your friend. Again, that's not what I hope happens and is not what I would vote for. I want to keep visitors from suspect countries out and let everyone else retain normal travel status. But if the only choice was "no visas" or "visas for everyone", I would have to vote "no visas".
We are at war. This is much more serious than any war we've ever been in. If we lose this one, we're out of the ballgame.
To: Mat_Helm
We should make it very clear that no matter who claims responsibilty, if any American city is nuked that within hours the following cities without hesitation will be eliminated as well starting with Bagdad, Damascus, Tehran, Beiruit, Kabul, Peshawar, Kartoom, You forgot Mecca and Medina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-145 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson