Wrong. The post IS true... It says Hillary
supported the murder and his accomplices, which is verified in several places in this thread. It says that the others went on to have professional success, which they did. They weren't murderers (and the article doesn't say they were), but they were complicit in a torture-murder, and certainly shouldn't be in the positions they are in right now. The end of the article says "As Paul Harvey says"... it does NOT imply that this was a Paul Harvey piece.
Sooo... Precisely which parts of the post do you disagree with?
It says Hillary supported the murder and his accomplices, which is verified in several places in this thread. No it doesn't. It says she "shut down Yale", which is crap. It implies her blanket defense of the panthers, which is unproven. At most, it looks like she may have assisted the lawyer who represented somebody present at the crime who wasn't the shooter (defending criminals in court, even really horrible ones, is an integral part of our legal system).
We don't do ourselves any favors clinging to falsehoods because they have a grain of truth in them.