Skip to comments.
Troubling Anthrax Additive Found; Atta Met Iraq
ABC News ^
| 10/28/01
| ABCNews.com
Posted on 10/28/2001 6:48:24 AM PST by Croooow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
To: jerod
As if they would postmark the letter from Iraq. It's already known that some terrorists involved in the attack were in NJ.
61
posted on
10/28/2001 3:41:51 PM PST
by
Croooow
To: jerod
Also my understanding is that they are focusing on a right wing group from the Midwest. And the postmark was from NJ?
62
posted on
10/28/2001 3:42:45 PM PST
by
Croooow
To: jerod
I don't like Bob Woodward, but he does get facts straight. What fact? When? Oh you mean back in 1974.
63
posted on
10/28/2001 3:45:13 PM PST
by
Nogbad
To: daviddennis
Go to post #39. Put your mouse on the words Aryan Nation in blue and click.
It'll take you right to the right wing nazi sight referenced in the Wash. Post story.
64
posted on
10/28/2001 7:15:50 PM PST
by
jerod
To: Croooow
If going to send anthrax and blame it on Muslims, or on the real Terrorist. Wouldn't you send it from a place where the Terrorist stayed, and where Muslims live?
65
posted on
10/28/2001 7:20:18 PM PST
by
jerod
To: jerod
Neo-Nazi and other extreme Right Wing groups are known to be very happy about the attacks on the WTC. They are also very gleeful about the negative and parnoid effects those attacks have had on the feeble minded members of society. Adding a little anthrax to the mix, and knowing that much of the American press corp fits into that feeble minded category. Makes them the number one suspects in these, for the most part, harmless anthrax attacks.
Your full of crapolla. The only people remarking they are happy about 9/11 have been LEFTWING TYPES.
To: jerod
That's exactly what I did. And I got the same message I did when I clicked on it last time - there is no such site, most likely because GeoCities took it down as a violation of their terms of service.
D
To: codercpc
The only problem with your line of reasoning, which I agree with by the way, is that when the time comes to actually pin in on Iraq, enough "reasonable doubt" will have been sown as to make "pinning it on Iraq" troublesome to say the least. The apologists for Iraq will say that our own government said that it could be home grown terrorists therefore, how can we say with any certainty that it is Iraq, and then how can you justify a huge response if your own investigation is so equivocal?
68
posted on
10/29/2001 8:07:44 AM PST
by
Loopy
To: daviddennis
Works fine on my machine. Maybe your service provider, or workplace has the site blocked.
69
posted on
10/29/2001 8:20:58 AM PST
by
jerod
To: jerod
Nope. I tried it both at home and at work. If it was blocked, it would not come up with a Geocities "Not Found" page. However, as it happens, I have no limitations on my Internet access in either place.
Do you have another URL for them?
D
To: daviddennis
You may think you have no limitations, but obviously you do, because I can access it at home and at work.
At work I have a Pentium III with office 2000 and at home I have webtv. It works fine in both formats. My brother (phlap) has also accessed the site, so the problem must be with your service providers.
It isn't exactly the nicest site in the world. Trust me, these guys are very Neo-Nazi and yes, they do support Bin-Laden.
71
posted on
10/29/2001 2:41:48 PM PST
by
jerod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson