Replies

Maybe if you weren't dumping this on the shoulders of Bush, you might not get such a response from others. You say Bush was in office practically a year - well it was 8 1/2 months. It makes me wonder why you would exaggerate his time in office except you obviously have it in for Bush. See my #31 and why I think Bush didn't catch up with this! All his in-briefings upon coming into office were given by Clinton's PC appointees - do you think they are going to give the straight poop? This is 99% Clinton fault. Bin Laden and Zawahiri did not come to power until after Somalia - which was on Clinton's watch and he did nothing for 8 years! The FBI knew there were terrorist cells in the US since 1996/1997. What the hell was Clinton doing about that?

If it's 99% Clinton's fault I suppose the actual perps get 1%?

So the Bush time in office was 8 and a half months. Could you answer my earlier question: How much time need pass before it would become the next President's fault?

Also, do you deny that Bush Sr. both as President and head of the CIA failed miserably concerning the state of our CIA?

What about Reagan? He failed to retaliate after 241 U.S. marines in Lebanon were slaughtered on his watch. Do you blame him for their deaths? Do you blame him for not only retaliating but supporting Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan afterwards?

None of you are showing any consistency in the way you evaluate our current dilemna. You're no different than the Dems who blame everything on a VRWC.