For instance - in the Starr Report - there was a paragraph that said:
"On Friday, January 2, 1998, Jane Doe #5 signed an affidavit in which she denied that the President made "unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies."(202) (On April 8, 1998, however, Jane Doe #5 stated to OIC investigators that this affidavit was false.)(203)"
A couple of weeks after the Starr Report was released, that short paragraph was "decoded" and the real meaning became apparent - it was posted on Free Republic on September 23, 1998 under the title - "DID JUANITA BROADDRICK RETRACT HER DENIAL OF CLINTON SEX ASSAULT?".
This information from that FR article about the Starr Report caused a public uproar and massive media coverage that eventually swayed enough votes in the House of Representatives to pass the Articles of Impeachment against Bill Clinton, and Juanita Broaddrick's interviews on NBC and The Wall Street Journal. (Unfortunately, the old Whitewater archives on FR are not currently available to access that historic post.)
The point is - there could be some bombshells in the Smaltz report too, just waiting for some FReeper to discover them.
Had to get into sympathy/victim mode before this report comes out and sullies him even more(can a muddy pig get muddier?). Now any reference to him will be met with claims of "piling on", "kicking a man while he's down", but mostly "just more of the mean right-wingers trying to attack him".
Another Arkansas Coincidence.
I had some old posts on my bookmark page that he reactivated for me.
Just makes me wonder if Sam Walton was a butt likkin boy of the Democrats too?
Not related to this post but interisting.