Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia's new wave drug addicts disconcert old guard
AFP ^ | 10/25/01 | Agence France Presse

Posted on 10/24/2001 8:48:51 PM PDT by Migraine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: A CA Guy
COWARDS are the ones who use illegal drugs

Cowards are those who---like you---make claims, flee from challenges, then make the same claims elsewhere.

Why is using illegal drugs any more "cowardly" than using a deadly addictive legal drug like alcohol? (By the way, I don't use alcohol or illegal drugs.)

41 posted on 10/25/2001 1:59:27 PM PDT by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
some recreational "drugs" are good.
42 posted on 10/25/2001 2:13:35 PM PDT by rickmoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AGAviator
There's a lot less to steal in Russia than there is in the West, and a per capita montly income of $100 is considered being well off.

That's a good point. If you have twenty bucks in your pocket in Turkey, you're a high roller.

43 posted on 10/25/2001 3:48:15 PM PDT by Hillary 666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Sounds pretty laissez-faire there Rubbish. Nothing in the article says drugs are legal. Thanks for trashing my response w/ no basis. All I said is that it seems laissez-faire. I based that on a lack of mention of enforcement except for one data collector type who seemed to shrug and give a "Whaddya gonna do?" kind of posture. The tone of the article is that it is tolerated, tacitly, which is how I mean to use the term, laissez-faire. I am just shocked that there are some people who think this kind of human degradation is OK. I maintain that a large segment of the human population is irresponsible (w/o getting into the reasons). Turn that segment loose on freely-available drugs and you can just kiss them goodbye. It's not pretty; neither is the crime and squalor they foment. Lastly, isn't it possible to dialogue politely, even when you disagree?
44 posted on 10/25/2001 4:15:24 PM PDT by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
All I said is that it seems laissez-faire. I based that on a lack of mention of enforcement except for one data collector type who seemed to shrug and give a "Whaddya gonna do?" kind of posture.

You mean this: "In those days it was pretty well impossible to obtain drugs at school, while today it's almost normal"? There's no "posture" there, just a bald statement of fact.

The tone of the article is that it is tolerated, tacitly

I detect no toleration, tacit or otherwise, just the fact of increased use.

Lastly, isn't it possible to dialogue politely, even when you disagree?

Yes it is---but the impoliteness started here: "Sounds pretty laissez-faire there, though, for those who think that's the way to go."

45 posted on 10/25/2001 8:18:44 PM PDT by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson