Skip to comments.
Russia's new wave drug addicts disconcert old guard
AFP ^
| 10/25/01
| Agence France Presse
Posted on 10/24/2001 8:48:51 PM PDT by Migraine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
To: A CA Guy
COWARDS are the ones who use illegal drugs Cowards are those who---like you---make claims, flee from challenges, then make the same claims elsewhere.
Why is using illegal drugs any more "cowardly" than using a deadly addictive legal drug like alcohol? (By the way, I don't use alcohol or illegal drugs.)
41
posted on
10/25/2001 1:59:27 PM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
To: Migraine
some recreational "drugs" are good.
42
posted on
10/25/2001 2:13:35 PM PDT
by
rickmoe
To: AGAviator
There's a lot less to steal in Russia than there is in the West, and a per capita montly income of $100 is considered being well off. That's a good point. If you have twenty bucks in your pocket in Turkey, you're a high roller.
To: MrLeRoy
Sounds pretty laissez-faire there Rubbish. Nothing in the article says drugs are legal. Thanks for trashing my response w/ no basis. All I said is that it seems laissez-faire. I based that on a lack of mention of enforcement except for one data collector type who seemed to shrug and give a "Whaddya gonna do?" kind of posture. The tone of the article is that it is tolerated, tacitly, which is how I mean to use the term, laissez-faire. I am just shocked that there are some people who think this kind of human degradation is OK. I maintain that a large segment of the human population is irresponsible (w/o getting into the reasons). Turn that segment loose on freely-available drugs and you can just kiss them goodbye. It's not pretty; neither is the crime and squalor they foment. Lastly, isn't it possible to dialogue politely, even when you disagree?
44
posted on
10/25/2001 4:15:24 PM PDT
by
Migraine
To: Migraine
All I said is that it seems laissez-faire. I based that on a lack of mention of enforcement except for one data collector type who seemed to shrug and give a "Whaddya gonna do?" kind of posture. You mean this: "In those days it was pretty well impossible to obtain drugs at school, while today it's almost normal"? There's no "posture" there, just a bald statement of fact.
The tone of the article is that it is tolerated, tacitly
I detect no toleration, tacit or otherwise, just the fact of increased use.
Lastly, isn't it possible to dialogue politely, even when you disagree?
Yes it is---but the impoliteness started here: "Sounds pretty laissez-faire there, though, for those who think that's the way to go."
45
posted on
10/25/2001 8:18:44 PM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson