Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hellinahandcart; dead; SuziQ
You know, from my vantage point in front of the TV that day, the tops of the towers appeared to be completely engulfed in smoke most of the time. I don't think a helicopter could have landed.
40 posted on 10/24/2001 10:01:13 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ninachka
Looking at the picture above, I'd agree.
41 posted on 10/24/2001 10:03:54 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
You need a picture from above, not from below. Tower 1 had a smoke free area on the roof.
50 posted on 10/24/2001 10:23:31 AM PDT by Andrew Byler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
If you look at other pictures, it seems that the roof of the North Tower was partly cleared of smoke by the breeze from the west.

I can't find a view from the north at the moment (which I seem to recall showed this best), but look at page 36 of the October issue of America's 1st Freedom (the NRA magazine) if you have access to it. This picture is from the east-northeast, fairly near the towers. The north face of the North Tower is partly clear of smoke all the way to the roof. The top of the antenna tower is also clear. This photo was taken just moments after the plane hit the South Tower; probably the fire in the North Tower was still spreading, and the smoke got worse later.

The smoke from the North Tower seems to have completely covered the roof of the South Tower, pretty much the whole time.

I wonder if the antenna on the North Tower also interfered with possible helicopter landings?

71 posted on 10/24/2001 12:06:08 PM PDT by Jordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson