"If the rights are inherent in all men,
and the US chooses only to recognize them in citizens,
but not in non-citizens,
it is denying rights which by definition
those people have by virtue of living,
and thus is not truly advocating freedom.
Just food for thought."
# 147 by MWS
I believe that, too.
If a man is on United States controlled territory,
his rights should be recognized,
except in time of national emergency,
when even a citizen's rights are curtailed.