In order to achieve your high(must be stoned)minded version of constitutionality it would, WITHOUT DOUBT, end in a huge increase in the Federal Government - anti-Constitution. More regulations, more misused taxes, more welfare, more children on welfare, more liberal lawsuits and T.V. commercials. All this to protect your narrow-minded myopic view (obviously drug induced) of the Constitution.
When abortion was illegal, there were a lot less...but I am sure the freedom loving pro-drug-choicer you are applies to the God given right to both get f#$%ed up and murder your young, right?
(By the way, do you support banning alcohol too? If not, why not?)
One cat is out of the bed pissing all over the place and tearing the house down, why not let the other 6 out. Why make it worse?
What new regulations and taxes would be required?
more welfare, more children on welfare, more liberal lawsuits
If you don't like welfare or liberal lawsuits (as I don't), fight THEM---don't use them as a cowardly excuse for further violations of the Constitution.
and T.V. commercials.
How are T.V. commercials anti-Constitution?
All this to protect your narrow-minded myopic view (obviously drug induced) of the Constitution.
Don't just call names---prove that the Constitution allows the feds to regulate the intrastate making, distributing, possessing, or using of drugs.
Go on---we'll wait.
(By the way, do you support banning alcohol too? If not, why not?)
One cat is out of the bed pissing all over the place and tearing the house down, why not let the other 6 out. Why make it worse?
Why not capture that one cat---why not ban alcohol? Come on, answer the question.