Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
I did answer it go back and read the post again. You just can't stand the idea your wrong.

Please tell me which statement, number 1 or number 2. Excuse me for looking for simplicity.

SD

1,927 posted on 10/22/2001 1:29:11 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1924 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
Please tell me which statement, number 1 or number 2. Excuse me for looking for simplicity.

Dave your like a dog chasing his tale on this one, better give it up while your only a mile or so behind.

BigMack

1,930 posted on 10/22/2001 1:32:33 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1927 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave
Maybe I can clarify the viewpoints here. PNAMBC is not saying that Jesus was not God in the womb. She is saying that Jesus received his humanity from Mary and his divinity from the Holy Spirit at conception. When a baby is conceived it gets traits from both the father and the mother. So Jesus received His humanity (trait) from Mary and His divinity (trait) from the Holy Spirit. Jesus is 100% God and 100% man. He was 100% man and 100% God in Mary's womb as well, but He did not receive His divinity from Mary, but rather from the Holy Spirit. Receive here may not be the best term as it presupposes not having, but I hope you see what I am getting at.

JM
1,933 posted on 10/22/2001 1:34:15 PM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1927 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson