Skip to comments.
The Polemics of Infant Baptism
The Polemics of Infant Baptism ^
| posted to FR as of October 5 2001
| Benjamin B. Warfield
Posted on 10/05/2001 11:02:13 PM PDT by Uriel1975
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-162 last
To: RnMomof7
althought I belong to a Wesleyan church one poster said I was an anabaptist..I have no problem with that!
I was only joking. Although there were some anabaptist elements that were pretty orthodox Christians, quite a number were very strange and unscriptural. Early Baptists worked hard to dispel the notion that they were anabaptists, given the general un-Christian reputation the most infamous anabaptists had earned in continental Europe. The odium attached to anabaptists persists to this day. Their modern descendents do not call themselves anabaptist even though their anabaptist roots are well-known.
You are not an anabaptist IMO. Merely a person who has rejected a falsely regenerative infant baptism ritual and instead correctly embraced believer's baptism as your own personal claim to the cross of Christ and as your personal and public testimony of faith in Him.
To: *Calvin
BTTL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-162 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson