[2Trievers]

"Let's Roll!"

[Movemout]

Good catch! I hope Mr. Kelly survives the dreaded series of letters heaped on him by weak kneed future slaves.

[nopardons]

Great article ! He is so right .

[G.Mason]

"How many preaching pacifism would accept life as a conquered people? "

A look at the last presidential election map of the United States will give a good idea.

[bond7]

He poses a great question, except they would not even have the opportunity to live as "conquered people.

The pacifists have a lack of grip on the basics this time - We Get Him or He Gets Us, and he's not taking prisioners - he takes their heads off.

[dennisw]

How many preaching pacifism would accept life as a conquered people?

Many would. These jack assess are also the gun grabbers. They are morally weak! They would be lining up at the mosques to convert......

...... no sword (of Islam) needed.

[babyfreep]

bump to hubby and thanks for the link, rock

[He Rides A White Horse]

How many preaching pacifism would accept life as a conquered people?

They already have.

[CaptSkip]

Phil Donahugh (SP?)

What a P***.Bill O "cleaned his Clock" on GMA!

What would Phil do if his wife was having HER throat slit?

CS

[snippy_about_it]

bump for later reading.

[hobbes1]

You know..the funny thing about this article is...
If you substitute the word Moron for Pacifist...It reads just as clearly...LOL

[2sheep]

Bump.

[VA Advogado]

Believe me, they wouldn't be pacifists once they conquered us. They would be as much terrorists as the taliban.

[Benoit Baldwin]

How many preaching pacifism would accept life as a conquered people?

How many preaching bellicism would accept life as a conquered people?

[Reaganesque]

History shows that the writer does need to be careful. As we saw in the 60's and more recently in Seattle, Washington DC and Genoa, Italy, these alleged "pacifists" are perfectly willing to resort to violence to prove they are peaceful. From rioting to setting cars and buildings on fire to planting bombs that kill innocent bystanders, the "peace" movement is capable of much violence for they were then, are now, and will ever be: liars, frauds and hypocrites.

[riley1992]

How many pacifists would be willing to accept the logical outcome of their creed of nonviolence even in face of attack — life as a conquered people? Not many, I would think. How many want the (mostly lower-class) men and women of the United States armed forces to continue to fight so that they may enjoy the luxury of preaching against fighting? Nearly all, I would think.

Very good piece. Thanks for posting it.

[copycat]

mark...

[stuartcr]

I think it would depend greatly on who it was that conqured them. There are many countries in the world where a lot of Americans would see little difference.

[Poohbah]

I believe it was George Orwell who said something to the effect that "the only reason you can sleep soundly at night is that rough men stand ready to do violence on your behalf."

[Inge_CAV]

BUMP!

[William Terrell]

How do you attach legitimacy and desirability to an idea? You slip the anti-idea in as advocated by a hated group.

Globalism. This article has some razor edges hidden with honey.