Skip to comments.
How many preaching pacifism would accept life as a conquered people?
Union Leader ^
| Oct 04, 2001
| Michael Kelly
Posted on 10/04/2001 2:03:10 AM PDT by 2Trievers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: xsmommy
You know..the funny thing about this article is...
If you substitute the word Moron for Pacifist...It reads just as clearly...LOL
21
posted on
10/04/2001 4:06:33 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
To: Thinkin' Gal;Jeremiah Jr;babylonian;Prodigal Daughter;Zadokite;American in Israel;TrueBeliever9
Bump.
22
posted on
10/04/2001 4:22:49 AM PDT
by
2sheep
To: 2Trievers
Believe me, they wouldn't be pacifists once they conquered us. They would be as much terrorists as the taliban.
To: Michael Kelley
How many preaching pacifism would accept life as a conquered people?
How many preaching bellicism would accept life as a conquered people?
To: 2Trievers
History shows that the writer does need to be careful. As we saw in the 60's and more recently in Seattle, Washington DC and Genoa, Italy, these alleged "pacifists" are perfectly willing to resort to violence to prove they are peaceful. From rioting to setting cars and buildings on fire to planting bombs that kill innocent bystanders, the "peace" movement is capable of much violence for they were then, are now, and will ever be: liars, frauds and hypocrites.
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: 2Trievers
How many pacifists would be willing to accept the logical outcome of their creed of nonviolence even in face of attack life as a conquered people? Not many, I would think. How many want the (mostly lower-class) men and women of the United States armed forces to continue to fight so that they may enjoy the luxury of preaching against fighting? Nearly all, I would think.Very good piece. Thanks for posting it.
To: Benoit Baldwin
OK, I'll bite. I looked up "bellicism," possible roots, and variant spellings in two different dictionaries and found nothing. What the hell does it mean?
To: hobbes1
been serving as a sort of kvetch basin for all sorts of unhappy people who like to yell about the awfulness of Amerika or international corporations or rich people or people who drive large cars or drug companies that test their products on bunny rabbits or life its own unfair self. I love this! "kvetch basin", what a great phrase! i loved the original article and applaud him for the even stronger follow up.
29
posted on
10/04/2001 5:23:38 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: 2Trievers
mark...
30
posted on
10/04/2001 5:24:39 AM PDT
by
copycat
To: Dear Tabby, Jim Robinson
(#10)
Yes, by "jackass" I do mean you reading this. In what sense are you free, moron?
Imbecile, I've seen your other posts. Slither back to goebbels.com.
31
posted on
10/04/2001 5:28:53 AM PDT
by
dighton
To: Lee'sGhost
I think he meant:
bel·li·cose (bl-ks) adj.
Warlike in manner or temperament; pugnacious. See Synonyms at belligerent.
32
posted on
10/04/2001 5:30:20 AM PDT
by
fone
To: Reaganesque
the "peace" movement is capable of much violence for they were then, are now, and will ever be: liars, frauds and hypocrites.I have a feeling as this goes on they will do all that here but then they will have started a war too with the US and anything goes. They are actually trying now to get more military killed by making the US seem weak and divided.
33
posted on
10/04/2001 5:38:14 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: Movemout
[American pacifists are]...future slavesI couldn't disagree more.
First of all, Americans will never let that happen regardless of how much they ask for and deserve such a fate.
Secondly, their self imposed ignorance makes their slavery very much current.
34
posted on
10/04/2001 5:57:45 AM PDT
by
70times7
To: FITZ
Not only are they the gun grabers, they are the eco terrorist, and pro-abortion baby killers.
Patrick Henry's words hold true today as they held true when he and the rest of the Founding Fathers fought for our liberty and freedom. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me LIBERTY or give me death.
35
posted on
10/04/2001 5:57:55 AM PDT
by
GailA
To: 2Trievers
I think it would depend greatly on who it was that conqured them. There are many countries in the world where a lot of Americans would see little difference.
36
posted on
10/04/2001 6:00:28 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
To: 2Trievers
I believe it was George Orwell who said something to the effect that "the only reason you can sleep soundly at night is that rough men stand ready to do violence on your behalf."
37
posted on
10/04/2001 6:00:59 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: 2Trievers
BUMP!
38
posted on
10/04/2001 6:01:11 AM PDT
by
Inge_CAV
To: G.Mason
All your freedom are belong to us!
39
posted on
10/04/2001 6:02:08 AM PDT
by
70times7
To: fone
Could be. Thanks. I know what bellicose is. What do you expect from someone who make "Baldwin" part of their posting name.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson