To: RightWhale;JudyB1938
FYI. Notice how everything that is 're-evaluated' turns out to always be older than previously stated.
2 posted on
10/03/2001 12:18:38 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
FYI. Notice how everything that is 're-evaluated' turns out to always be older than previously stated. I dont understand, what exactly was re-evaluated, according to this article?
6 posted on
10/03/2001 12:26:25 PM PDT by
Paradox
To: blam
The older you and I get, the less long ago 30,000 years seems. 300 people who each lived to 110 could represent the entire period. Only 300 lives. If each were 105 and each taught a 5 year old everything, names, dates, places, and the 5 year old did the same in his turn, we could have an oral tradition going all the way back. 300 isn't many. 30,000 years isn't much.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson