Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Review Cans Columnist Ann Coulter
Washington Post ^ | 10/2/01 | Howard Kurtz

Posted on 10/01/2001 10:00:14 PM PDT by Jean S

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:21 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Even by her usual incendiary standards, Ann Coulter's response to the terrorist attacks was something of a jaw-dropper.

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity," the conservative commentator declared in her column on National Review Online.

Those words created an uproar at the Web site, which refused to run a follow-up piece in which Coulter singled out what she called "swarthy males." She promptly began bad-mouthing National Review, which responded by axing her as a contributing editor.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-455 next last
To: BoomerBob
Didn't we FReep him already?
241 posted on 10/02/2001 12:04:44 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam; TLBSHOW
Can you go to the magazine stand and take out those little subscription cards, then mail them back to NR with a strong message in Magic Marker? They have to pay the postage. Or is that illegal?

Actually, that was an idea in Abbie Hoffman's book, Steal This Book. Remember Abbie Hoffman, the 1960's anti-war, pro-communist agitator who was part of the "Chicago Seven" who were charged with criminal acts during the 1968 Democrat Party Convention in Chicago?

Anyway, he suggested taking those Return Postage Paid postcards or envelopes from junk mail, and taping them to a brick and mailing it. If enough people did so, the theory was, the postage due could bring the capitalist pigs to their knees in bankruptcy!

BTW - you cannot find copies of Hoffman's book in any library. They've all been stolen!

242 posted on 10/02/2001 12:05:08 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Ymani Cricket
forced conversion? sheesh. Back to the dark ages.

There it is again. I have seen this accusatory presumption many times.

I did not see anything about Forced Conversion to anything.

I have heard many liberals jump to the same conclusion.

This conclusion is usually reserved to those who have an unnatural fear of proselytizing of any kind.

I never assumed she meant forced converstion, therefore I will give her the benefit of the doubt.

Since I usually agree with true traditional American conservatives, I do not have a default mechanism set up that automatically assumes the worst meaning from the mouth of a Christian conservative.

I think we should give this ally the benefit of the doubt.

I presume what she really meant was that we need to get rid of the murderers who keep these people away from the truth; that keep these people in the bondage of a false religion that will produce yet more terrorists in the future.

Ann was rightly getting directly to the root of the problem; the leaders will kill anyone who would attempt to give them a chance to hear the tenets of biblical Christianity, so they are stuck with this religion of terrorism that they have. You have to get rid of the Osama bin Ladens

Her sentiments are much like General Douglas MacArthur's at the end of World War 2; he pushed hard to send as many Christian missionaries as possible to Japan to replace the anscestor and emperor worship that was the existing religion (their leaders were already either dead or powerless). He saw this religion as inferior to Christianity and also as a reason for their aggression.

She is just wanting to get rid of the underlying problem, the religion of following the koran as it is written.

243 posted on 10/02/2001 12:05:26 AM PDT by OriginalIntent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Do you remember when the flame war happened between them?
244 posted on 10/02/2001 12:06:42 AM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: OriginalIntent
This conclusion is usually reserved to those who have an unnatural fear of proselytizing of any kind.

The Taliban come to mind.

245 posted on 10/02/2001 12:08:56 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: OriginalIntent
Yeah. Come to think of it, they canned General McArthur too.
246 posted on 10/02/2001 12:10:33 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: OriginalIntent
See my post at #145
247 posted on 10/02/2001 12:12:11 AM PDT by Ymani Cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
How easy it would be to "convert" these folks!!

Ann can do it.  She is inclined to convert some
people to death.  That's what started her flame
war with Jonah.  The editor.  Ouch.

248 posted on 10/02/2001 12:13:02 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes!
249 posted on 10/02/2001 12:13:44 AM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
She's hot (or at least a lot of folks think so) and she's not illiterate....that's about all you can say.....She's very abrasive and annoying on TV. She grew up in Greenwich and has gotten by on her looks all her life and it shows. Her looks are rapidly deteriorating.

LOFL !!! Spoken just like a sneaky, smacked-arse liberal, lol.
Thanks for proving my point - - liberals hate Ann as much as they hate the truth.

250 posted on 10/02/2001 12:14:03 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Every writer, really? Better than the likes of Mark Levin, Newt Gingrich, Rammesh Ponnuru, John J. Miller and of course W.F. Buckley? Oh yeah, that George Will guy, he's not a very good writer either! Not to mention articles by such illustrious conservative women who have contributed to NR in the past like Kate Biern, Jeane Kirkpatrick and I do believe Margret Thatcher.

Of course, none of those people could ever hope to be as accomplished as Ann Coulter.

251 posted on 10/02/2001 12:14:28 AM PDT by BoomerBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion,JMJ333
I join with JH2 and will not post from NR. I encourage
all FReepers to join this boycott and let them know it. Jonah Goldberg
sucks.

Ann Coulter's columns slamming libertarians
and the war she got in with Jonah over it
count for nothing with social conservatives,
I realize.   But you aren't the only ones
on FR.

252 posted on 10/02/2001 12:16:41 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: OriginalIntent
I think she did just fine with the story. The left at the democrats sites started against Ann after it was written and I am sure the left said they were conservatives when they emailed NR. It really is a shame to lose a conservative magazine to the rats but so be it. Bye Bye NR. See ya at the rats site.
253 posted on 10/02/2001 12:18:31 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: American Soldier
Re Coulter's comment about "swarthy males". I didn't read her column. On the face of it though, her calling some males swarthy seems innocent enough. Were the males she called swarthy, swarthy?
254 posted on 10/02/2001 12:19:06 AM PDT by Dixielander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BoomerBob
Of course, none of those people could ever hope to be as accomplished as Ann Coulter

true and you are correct

255 posted on 10/02/2001 12:22:09 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity,"

Well it was a stupid statement. How can you convert dead leaders to Christianity? She should have stated that we should convert everyone we don't kill to Christianity. It was her grammer that got her in trouble. Syntax can be deadly.

What we need at a time like this is a Pope who has the cajones to call a CRUSADE. Too bad Maggie Thatcher isn't Catholic.

256 posted on 10/02/2001 12:24:24 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Correction to my earlier post:

(it's getting late) It's Kate O'Beirne.

257 posted on 10/02/2001 12:26:09 AM PDT by BoomerBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
...a B-52 could convert them into "quivering mounds of jihadic jelly" in about 3 hours.

Maybe not, but a few well placed fuel-air bombs certainly would give them a short look at their future eternal Islamic Paradise.

258 posted on 10/02/2001 12:27:52 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: OriginalIntent
Thanks for setting the record stright with a little in sight to "This is war" and its original intent.
259 posted on 10/02/2001 12:28:47 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
How easy it would be to "convert" these folks!!

It only took two small nuclear blasts to convince almost every Japanese citizen that Hirohito was not God.

260 posted on 10/02/2001 12:29:33 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson