Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anthrax Q & A
Oct. 1, 2001 | Kevin G. Briggs

Posted on 09/30/2001 11:18:34 PM PDT by seeker41

The following question-and-answer sheet was prepared by Kevin G. Briggs, former president of the America Civil Defense Association and current director of the U.S. Disaster Preparedness Institute. His new book, Preparing for Terrorism will be released shortly.

Due to recent concerns and the growing interest in biological/chemical warfare preparedness and mitigation, we have extracted the following article from a recent issue of the Journal of Civil Defense in an effort to assist you in your preparations for a potential biological attack on the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions About Anthrax:

Question 1:

Is the U.S. prepared for anthrax attacks?

Answer 1:

Generally, no. An anthrax attack can occur very quietly without any bombs going off or any observable "clouds" being present. Our abilities to detect anthrax rapidly are very limited at present, so the first sign that an attack occurred could be thousands of people rushing to the hospital after a few days of exposure. Most states rate biological attacks as one of their weakest preparedness areas.

Question 2:

Why worry about anthrax attacks?

Answer 2:

Many are concerned that USA-based terrorists with ties to Irag or Osama bin Laden might try to unleash a biological attack against the U.S. population in response to any major U.S. anti-terrorism initiative or military actions.

Question 3:

Is this a credible threat?

Answer 3:

This is an unknown. We know that Iraq has hidden and lied about much of its biological warfare program. We do know that Iraq has claimed to have produced, and subsequently destroyed (so it says), roughly 9,000 liters of anthrax.

In addition, it has admitted testing anthrax and other agents as part of its biowarfare program. As a result of this and other perceived threats, former Secretary of Defense Cohen decided to vaccinate all active duty and reserve personnel against anthrax.

He shifted $500 million to new chemical and biological preparedness programs. Former President Clinton also added roughly $10 billion to the budget (in January 1999) into preparing for weapons of mass destruction terrorism – largely to help mitigate biowarfare attacks.

The bottom line is that Iraq has the technical expertise and demonstrated capability to support anthrax terrorism. Whether it or other terrorist organizations have successfully placed (or attempted to place) terrorists in the U.S. with anthrax is unknown – or at least unknown to the American public.

Many other countries have known or suspected biological warfare programs. Information and expertise from Russia's extensive biowarfare programs are likely to have leaked out to several other nations and terrorist groups.

Question 4:

How big a problem is anthrax?

Answer 4:

Anthrax weapons can be produced that can have the same killing capability as nuclear weapons for a fraction of the cost and expertise. For example, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory did a comparison of costs of various threats and came up with the following:

Weapon Lethality Versus Cost

From the late Dr. Conrad Chester
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Weapons compared to cost for killing most people within a square-mile area

Conventional cluster bomb weapons: up to millions of dollars

Neutron bomb: roughly $2 million

One ton of GB nerve agent: up to $100,000

1 kilogram of anthrax (2.2 lb): less than $50

Question 5:

How deadly is anthrax?

Answer 5:

According to the late Dr. Chester of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, cultured anthrax has roughly 2 x 10 to the fifth lethal doses per gram. Anthrax in a slurry has roughly 10 to the seventh lethal doses per gram. Powdered Anthrax has roughly 10 to the eighth lethal doses per gram.

Former Secretary of Defense Cohen illustrated this point on TV by saying that a five-pound bag of anthrax, if properly dispersed, could kill perhaps half of the population of Washington, D.C.

Dr. Harold Strunk, who retired from the U.S. military and has extensive experience with anthrax, stated that a sugar cube quantity of anthrax could theoretically kill 100 million people. He pointed out that in reality, the number of people potentially killed by this amount of anthrax is much less because of the problems of dispersal within a population.

Question 6:

How would an anthrax attack occur?

Answer 6:

According to the late Dr. Chester, the best method of spreading lethal anthrax is through spraying the spores into the wind, where it is subsequently inhaled and begins to multiply. Dr. Chester, while at Oak Ridge National Labs, looked at many anthrax attack scenarios, which resulted, in part, with the following estimations:

Scenario 1: A single-operator terrorist with a truck-mounted 55-gallon drum of anthrax and sprayer could cause tens of thousands of deaths within a city.

Scenario 2: A sophisticated and well-trained technical terrorist group with four medium-sized planes (DC-3 size) were shown to potentially kill 35 percent of the U.S. population with one night flight spraying anthrax over key population centers.

Question 7:

Some experts say anthrax is difficult to disperse through air and sunlight. Is this true?

Answer 7:

Presumably the terrorists would be trained on what the best weather conditions are for dispersing anthrax spores and how to effectively produce an aerosol laden with anthrax spores. According to experts, this would typically be done at night or on an overcast day with a gentle breeze so that the sun would not kill off the spores before they are inhaled. Terrorists can certainly wait for the right weather conditions to exist. According to studies performed by the Oak Ridge Labs and the U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, a well-executed attack can kill thousands to many millions. The Defense Department has formally stated that a large portion of a city could be killed in a well-executed anthrax attack.
Question 8:

How vulnerable is the food supply to anthrax?

Answer 8:

Anthrax spores can fall upon food in either a dedicated attack on the food supply or as a secondary effect of an airborne release. If ingested in a sufficient dose, then an intestinal form of anthrax can occur that can be lethal for somewhere between 25 percent and 60 percent of those infected - if it is conventional anthrax for which we have clinical data resulting from the few cases where people ate infected meat. However, if the antibiotic supplies are limited, or a more drug-resistant strain is used, then a higher percentage of deaths would likely be expected.

Question 9:

What should be done at the governmental level?

Answer 9:

Educate the public on the threat and how to counter it. This should include candid (but sanitized) information on any known attempted threats that have occurred in the past. The public deserves to know what is fact and what is fiction with the many rumors that have spread. (For example, USA Today and other news outlets reported a few years ago that there were several attempts by terrorists with biological warfare agents from Iraq who were successfully thwarted as they tried to enter our country – and some news sources said that some actually did enter.)

Public education should also include how to prepare in advance to limit your exposure during any future biowarfare attack, as well as instructing medical personnel on how to treat this disease (see the USPDI website for some practical recommendations).

Learn more about the Russian and other strains of anthrax and develop new vaccines and antibiotics as required. Research on new non-drug-based antibiotics, such as the ASAP Solution being studied at BYU, should be accelerated. Expand the current vaccination program for people who live in high-threat areas or in high-risk professions. For example, a vaccination program similar to what is required of the military could be offered on a voluntary basis to medical personnel and Ffirst responders to blast/chem/bio/radiation scenes.

Encourage Congress to increase the vaccine production capabilities in the U.S. (currently only one company in the U.S. produces the vaccine) so that concerned citizens can be vaccinated, not just U.S. military personnel, and to allow for rapid mass immunizations should a large terrorist biowarfare attack occur.

Continue research on rapid detection devices for anthrax and other biological weapons and distribute these for real-time, 24-hour monitoring of major urban areas.

Increase the quantity of stockpiled antibiotics as well as the number of dispersal locations to respond to anthrax and other biowarfare attacks. Hours of delay in receiving antibiotics can translate to thousands or millions of additional deaths. Antibiotic stockpiles should be readily available to the medical community without having to wait 12 or more hours. Low-cost disposable respirator masks and latex gloves should also be stockpiled, as the current supplies (especially of respirators) could be quickly depleted and lead to many unnecessary deaths and prolonged social disruption.

Train and immunize emergency services personnel on how to identify/treat/triage biowarfare victims and how to limit the further spread of anthrax and other biological agents.

Upgrade intelligence, customs and law enforcement capabilities to thwart potential biological terrorists without infringing on citizens' rights.

Question 10:

What can the average American do to be prepared?

Answer 10:

Here are some practical steps to consider:

There is an extremely low risk of biological attack if you live far outside a major urban area. Hence, if you live tens of miles outside a major city, you probably do not need to do much to be prepared other than have food, water, power, and medical supplies, etc., stored up in case of long infrastructure outages due to biological attacks. Some low-cost medical supplies, such as disposable HEPA or N95 respirators and some latex gloves, would be needed if a highly infectious bio-warfare agent was used.

If you live in or near a large urban area, you should learn how to make bio-safe rooms at your home and place of business (see for details). If you learn of an attack that is imminent or has occurred in your area:

Go inside your home or business and close your windows. Prepare a bio-safe room and don a HEPA or N95-style respirator mask, if available.

Monitor the radio or TV and seek medical advice immediately. The USDPI website provides information resources on what the military and others recommend for anthrax and other biowarfare agents. If there is a known attack and you have previously been recommended to do so by your doctor, begin taking a safe dose of antibiotics. Be careful, because there is some wrong information out there produced by popular so-called biowarfare experts. This literature can be dangerous when it comes to dosages, especially as it pertains to mapping vet dosages of animals to humans.
If you really believe you've been exposed, you need to seek professional advice and antibiotic treatments immediately. If you wait until clear symptoms appear (normally after one to six days after exposure), in the case of anthrax, it will probably be too late to save yourself. However, be careful not to overreact to false warnings or rumors of attacks.

Dead animals or people who have died from anthrax should not be cut into but buried quickly and deeply or cremated to reduce spore spread, which occurs with exposure to air. Those treating suspected anthrax patients should wash their hands frequently and take preventive antibiotics [though sick human to well human transmission is unlikely].

Try to obtain vaccinations for anthrax if really concerned. (Note: These are not currently available to the general public, only the military and certain other fields, like veterinarians). You can write to your congressman to see if Congress can work to make this an option to the average American. There are a lot of issues surrounding the effectiveness of the vaccination program. One argument is that if an attack occurs with a genetically engineered special strain of anthrax (as with the Russian versions), the vaccine will not help much. The counter argument is that in many scenarios, especially one with a less sophisticated adversary, the vaccine may prove helpful in reducing your risk.

TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: HiTech RedNeck
Penicillin does work against some strains of anthrax, but yes, you're correct - there are other strains that apparently are resistant.

Also, I have family members who have already had problems with drugs in the -cillin family, so we'll have to be prepared in other ways.

21 posted on 10/01/2001 12:06:21 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
I'm particularly concerned about this threat cuz my residence is in the 4th largest city in the USA with a very busy port. To top it all off I just got layed off at the 2nd biggest computer maker 10 days ago. Oh well, we are all in the same boat and am more concerned about my country at this point.
22 posted on 10/01/2001 12:06:47 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Or cranberry pills, available at health food stores. I know of two brands and they are much more concentrated than the juice.
Hmm, can I see a new market for Welch's? "Your cure against Anthrax, available in -Apple -Raspberry and new -Mango flavors" :)
23 posted on 10/01/2001 12:08:19 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lelio
How about straight cranberries?
24 posted on 10/01/2001 12:10:01 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Scenario 2: A sophisticated and well-trained technical terrorist group with four medium-sized planes (DC-3 size) were shown to potentially kill 35 percent of the U.S. population with one night flight spraying anthrax over key population centers.

Bye bye blue zone

25 posted on 10/01/2001 12:11:30 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Scenario 2: A sophisticated and well-trained technical terrorist group with four medium-sized planes (DC-3 size) were shown to potentially kill 35 percent of the U.S. population with one night flight spraying anthrax over key population centers.

btw the bye bye blue zone was gallows humor. however with the current shootdown orders for straying aircraft, this scenario sounds unlikely

26 posted on 10/01/2001 12:12:52 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I agree, two many F-16s flying around up there. But I have had bizarre thoughts of hot air balloons and other such things.
27 posted on 10/01/2001 12:18:43 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
What's the "blue zone"?
28 posted on 10/01/2001 12:22:43 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Do you know if our dogs can also become ill, and if so, how good their chances are of surviving? This concerns me as much as getting ill with it myself!
29 posted on 10/01/2001 12:22:56 AM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopefulpilgrim
I think all living creatures are susceptible. Dogs were used in Iraq for such experimentation with Anthrax. I have also heard reports that our sats. detected lots of dead animals in one of OBL's training camps.
30 posted on 10/01/2001 12:27:12 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Allusion to the USA Today county by county map of Bush vs. Gore election results. Big cities are traditionally heavy Democrat voting zones, colored blue in this map.
31 posted on 10/01/2001 12:29:10 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
At least the hot air balloons, kites, model airplanes etc. either lack the carrying capacity or the roving capacity to wage such a widespread attack.
32 posted on 10/01/2001 12:30:32 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
They've tested all kinds of nasties on animals, not just anthrax.

We should recruit PETA to go over there!

33 posted on 10/01/2001 12:32:21 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"Former Secretary of Defense Cohen illustrated this point on TV by saying that a five-pound bag of anthrax, if properly dispersed, could kill perhaps half of the population of Washington, D.C."

This is what got my attention initally. Now dispersal is another matter, heck I even thought about mosquito spraying trucks like we see here in the summer especially afer the great Houston flood in June.

34 posted on 10/01/2001 12:40:06 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
For this small a quantity to do the job, would virtually require spraying it directly in everybody's nostrils.
35 posted on 10/01/2001 12:44:09 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
We should recruit PETA to go over there!

And send Je$$e Jacka$$ and Al $harpton as their emissaries...

36 posted on 10/01/2001 12:44:15 AM PDT by wayne_shrugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

A number of possible therapeutic strategies have yet to be fully explored experimentally or submitted for approval to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The recommendations provided do not represent uses currently approved by the FDA but are a consensus based on best available information of recent studies.

Given the fulminant course of inhalation anthrax, early antibiotic administration is essential to maximize patient survival. Given the difficulty in achieving timely microbiologic diagnosis of anthrax, all persons with fever or evidence of systemic disease in an area where anthrax cases are occurring should be treated empirically for anthrax until the disease is excluded.

No clinical studies exist of the treatment of inhalation anthrax in humans. Most naturally occurring strains of anthrax are sensitive to penicillin, and penicillin historically has been the preferred therapy for the treatment of anthrax. Penicillin and doxycycline are FDA-approved antibiotics for anthrax. Doxycycline is the preferred option from the tetracycline class of antibiotics because of its proven efficacy in monkey studies. Experts currently recommend initiation of ciprofloxacin or other fluoroquinolones in adults with presumed inhalation anthrax infection. Following a terrorist attack, assume resistance to penicillin and tetracycline class antibiotics until laboratory testing demonstrates otherwise.

In a contained casualty setting (a situation in which a modest number of patients require therapy), initiate intravenous antibiotics for symptomatic patients. In adults, ciprofloxacin 400 mg IV q12h is recommended. Traditionally, ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones are not recommended for use in children younger than 16-18 years because of a link to permanent arthropathy in adolescent animals and transient arthropathy in a small number of children.

Balancing these small risks against the real risk of death and resistant strains of B anthracis, experts recommend that ciprofloxacin be given to a pediatric population for initial therapy or postexposure prophylaxis following anthrax attack. In children, ciprofloxacin at 20-30 mg/kg/d IV in 2 daily doses (not to exceed 10 g/d) is recommended. If antibiotic susceptibility testing allows, substitute intravenous penicillin for the fluoroquinolones. For adults and children older than 12 years, penicillin G at 4 million U IV q4h is recommended for 60 days. Doxycycline at 100 mg IV q12h for 60 days is an acceptable alternative for adults. For children younger than 12 years, penicillin G is dosed 50,000 U/kg IV q6h for 60 days.

In experimental models, antibiotic therapy during anthrax infection has prevented development of an immune response. This suggests that even if the antibiotic-treated patient survives anthrax infection, risk of recurrence remains for at least 60 days. Oral therapy should replace intravenous therapy as soon as a patient's clinical condition improves.

Historically, the treatment of cutaneous anthrax has been oral penicillin. Recent recommendations suggest that oral fluoroquinolones or tetracycline antibiotics, as well as amoxicillin, are suitable alternatives if antibiotic susceptibility is proven. Although previous guidelines have suggested treating cutaneous anthrax with 7-10 days of therapy, recent recommendations suggest treatment for 60 days in the setting of bioterrorism, given the presumed exposure to the primary aerosol. Treatment of cutaneous anthrax generally prevents progression to systemic disease, although it does not prevent the formation and evolution of the eschar.

Other antibiotics effective against B anthracis in vitro include chloramphenicol, erythromycin, clindamycin, extended spectrum penicillins, macrolides, aminoglycosides, vancomycin, cefazolin, and other first-generation cephalosporins.

In pregnant women, experts recommend that ciprofloxacin be given for therapy and postexposure prophylaxis following anthrax attack. Substitute intravenous penicillin for the fluoroquinolones if microbiologic testing confirms penicillin susceptibility.

37 posted on 10/01/2001 1:07:49 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Thanks- I'll cross-link this to these:

NBC/ABC Warfare Survival Skills Links

The Poor-Boy Nuke-- Bioterrorism***

38 posted on 10/01/2001 1:48:36 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
a yikes! bump
39 posted on 10/01/2001 7:49:52 AM PDT by woollyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
seeker41 post #9: "Here's the link to the website with more information, if someone could link it will be appreciated. "

GO TO THIS LINK (it's about the only HTML tag I can do so I get a kick out of helping other FReepers any time I get a chance).

ps: Hi, backhoe. Thanks for your links.

40 posted on 10/01/2001 7:59:36 AM PDT by spald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson