Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Clintons,Abdurahman Alamoudi,and the Myth of "Moderate"Islam
News Max.com ^ | 11-06-00 | Lawrence Auster

Posted on 09/19/2001 1:33:37 PM PDT by Betty Jo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: KLT
A swift kick!
81 posted on 03/25/2002 4:41:33 PM PST by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: kattracks;mewzilla;Fred Mertz;OKCSubmariner;smorgle;Wallaby;Ann Archy
Read all the dates very carefully!

Read it again after reading todays McKenny article!

82 posted on 04/23/2002 4:42:18 AM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMAson;steve-b;ohioman;ClancyJ;Hillary's Lovely Legs;
Read all the dates!
83 posted on 04/23/2002 1:46:28 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Anniegetyourgun;patrioteagle911;=intervention=
Read all the dates
84 posted on 04/23/2002 1:47:50 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
However, this same Alamoudi is still buddies with the Bush White House!

How do you know this?

85 posted on 04/23/2002 9:04:54 PM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
Bush took the above mentioned actions with the Muslims to include all religions in his efforts. There is no special affinity for the Muslims. He was merely being the President of all people of the U.S.

If Bush was aligned with the Muslims there would not have been the assault on terrorism we are now involved in.

To try and drag up some ties with Muslims to taint the Bush administration is trash and makes me wonder about your purpose here. I could give a 100 reasons why there is no worry about Bush being friends with Muslims or inviting them to the White House. Appears to me you are trying to smear Bush.

86 posted on 04/23/2002 9:14:58 PM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
I hope you read the dates on this post.I pinged you on this old story because of the new McKinney story where everyone is going nuts about her.

Bush has this man in the White House, knowing that he is related to the Yemen Al-Amoudi, that funds Bin Laden.

So, if everyone wants to hang McKinney,shouldnt they wonder why Bush invites him to the White House?

If you wonder about my "purpose" here, go read the "purpose" of FR!

87 posted on 04/23/2002 10:17:53 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
Look, Bush has many people to the White House. Are you going to smear him on every visitor that you don't like? In early 1991 we were not that worried about the Muslims. His faith based iniative was getting off the ground and of course he had ALL religous faiths to the White House to be fair to all.

You claim he is a "friend" to this Muslim. How do you determine a "friend"? Bush meets with Saudis, French, English, Jews, Catholics, Muslims, Christians.

Now just what are you insinuating? Are you trying to claim that since Bush had Muslims to the White House and since you think he was a friend to this relative of Bin Laden, he has no right to resent McKinney calling him a traitor and having fore knowledge of 9/11.

If this is the case, I am really upset with you. You are smearing Bush - not McKinney based on your innuenendo that is based on absolutely nothing.

You need to look at President Bush and see what kind of man he is. All of your theories are nonsense. McKinney should be impeached. Bush has all kind of people contacting him for any number of reasons. There is nothing going on with Bush that is not above board. Such a pity that you know nothing about this President.

By the way, check a little further and you will find that there were Bin Ladens in this country that did business with many people. They had disowned their brother years ago and were very respected people here. They have since left the country because of their name.

Please spell out exactly what you think about Bush. Quit hiding behind vague comments intended to cast doubt on this fine man.

88 posted on 04/23/2002 10:43:08 PM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ;OKCSubmariner;Wallaby;Ann Archy;backhoe;Fred Mertz
I can tell you have no idea of what's up !

If you still want clarification,read all Al-Amoudi,Alamoudi,Bin Laden-Boston,Hybridon,Bin Mahfouz articles,right here on FT!

89 posted on 04/24/2002 10:32:06 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo,Uncle Bill
GW Bush should now be fully aware that these sharks have been and still are swimming all around him, his business, legal (Adkin Gump) and political advisors and his campaign fund raisers:

Al-Amoudi,Alamoudi,Bin Laden-Boston,Hybridon,Bin Mahfouz

Uncle Bill and Betty Jo have documented these sharks' dealings quite voluminously over the past three months on FR.

90 posted on 04/25/2002 9:51:29 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson