Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wallaby
As time goes on, I expect more and more Americans to start asking why Clinton was asleep at the switch for eight years regarding terrorism.

He literally did NOTHING.

7 posted on 09/17/2001 3:09:06 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur, OKCSubmariner
More failures?
9 posted on 09/17/2001 3:30:02 PM PDT by Wallaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
As time goes on, I expect more and more Americans to start asking why Clinton blabla

What? You're underestimating the US sheeple big time.

10 posted on 09/17/2001 3:34:45 PM PDT by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
As time goes on, I expect more and more Americans to start asking why Clinton was asleep at the switch for eight years regarding terrorism.

I certainly hope so. Of course we know that a) Clinton didn't care about terrorism anyway (except unleashing his own brand of terrorism in our country). b) That by selling our defense secrets to China he only encouraged our enemies around the world to take the chance of planning acts of war against America. c) Even if Clinton wanted to do something about terrorism he was too pre-occupied with managing his scandals and avoiding impeachment to have time for it. d) Clinton of course never had the character or backbone to begin with to take on a tough challenge if it didn't involve a political campaign and e) The idea of putting America's interest before his own is a foreign concept to Clinton.

This is the price we are paying for keeping this Creep in office for 8 years while he, his wife and fellow communists virtually debased every single scared institution in this great country.

13 posted on 09/17/2001 3:46:16 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
... I expect more and more Americans to start asking why Clinton
was asleep at the switch for eight years regarding terrorism.

But it's Bush's problem now. Clinton is a washed up blowhard.

16 posted on 09/17/2001 4:00:25 PM PDT by dbbeebs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Actually, sink, clinton did do something ... he bombed empty tents with $2,000,000 missles and destroyed an aspirine factory in the Sudan, for which we are paying reparations. He aided and abetted terrorism by declaring war on it then defunding the intel efforts to fight it and emasculating the military capabilities to wage a best methodology war on it. Clinton actually did quite a lot, sinkspur, all complicit with empowering the terrorists of course.

Can we have the smiling bastard strapped to the first cruise missle launched into Afghani territory? I would like that.

20 posted on 09/17/2001 4:19:23 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
He literally did NOTHING.

We wish. In reality he and his henchmen promoted and permitted export of so called "dual use" technologies, even to countries such as Iran, Syria, and Afghanistan which provide state support to various terrorist groups. They futher gutted the HUMINT capabilities of the CIA. Nothing would have been better, much better. Let's see, isn't there something in the Constitution about giving aide and comfort to the enemies of the United States...oh yes, one of the criteria for treason. He should be strung up by the object of Monica's attentions for a month or ten, live on a WebCam hookup.

24 posted on 09/17/2001 5:05:21 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
yes he did. Clinton brought lots of terrorists into the country and TRAINED them
37 posted on 09/17/2001 9:41:25 PM PDT by alithia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson