Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s media traitors
New Australian ^ | Tuesday 18 September 2001 | by James Henry

Posted on 09/17/2001 10:59:02 AM PDT by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Hidy
Sorry, dear, but even the far-left media watchdog FAIR criticized Clinton's attack on the aspirin factory. If his mission was legit, and not merely a "wag the dog", why didn't he finish the job? I have honestly tried to avoid any politicizing when it comes to military actions. I never accused Clinton of wagging the dog at the time. But, when even leftists make such claims, you have to give it some credence.
21 posted on 09/17/2001 1:33:52 PM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Hidy
Re: "I can't even name the number of "scandals" that the press and conservatives in general were able to stain Clinton with. In every case but one, all those charges turned out to be lies."

And which ONE would that be, hmmm?

Was that the, "I never had sex with that woman... and never asked anyone to lie."?

Or was it when he fired the White House travel staff?

Or was it when he denied he had an affair with Gennifer Flowers until she produced 8 hours of taped conversations from her telephone answering machine?

Or was it when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory in Sudan to subvert the criminal justice process?

Or was it when it was proved his 1996 presidential campaign illegally solicited and received millions from the Communist Chinese?

Or was it when Clinton directed Ron Brown to extort campaign donations from businessmen in exchange for seats on overseas trade delegations?

Or was it when he feminized the military?

Or was it when he tried to overturn the 10th Amendment by Executive Order?

Or was it when he transfered sensitive military technology to the PLA?

Or was it when he tried to lock up millions of American public land and place it under United Nations control?

Or was it when his assinine forest management policy resulted in the Los Alamos fire and several of the most deatly and devastating out-of-control forest fires occuring in this nation's history?

Or was it when he denied he had tried Marijuana and later recanted, claiming to never have inhaled?

Or was it when he was proved to have dodged the draft and also revealed that he said he "loathed" the military?

Was was when he illegally attacked the sovereign nation of Yugoslavia, intervening in their civil war on trumped-up charges of genocide which were later completely disproved?

Or was it when his wife's staff gutted Vince Foster's office after he committed suicide, thereby destroying any potential evidence?

Or was it when Hillary Clinton hid and doctored her Rose Law Firm billing records until after the Whitewater investigation was all but complete?

Ow was it when he and his wife hired professionals to intimidate anyone who might testify against them?

Or was it when his administration refused to comply with court ordered subpeonas and lied and hid thousands of e-mails from court investigators?

Or was it when Clinton signed a rash of unpopular last-minute Executive Orders on the eve of leaving the White House in order to subvert/discredit the new Bush administration?

Or was it when he denied even knowing Juanita Broaddrick, the woman he raped so many years ago and said, "that looks pretty bad. You should put some ice on it."

To which ONE scandal were you refering? Don't bother to reply. You don't have the guts you lying dog.

23 posted on 09/17/2001 2:55:57 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hidy
And nowadays, criticism comes with calumnies and insults, because that's the way conservatives wanted it.

Problem is, what you call "insults and lies" when they come at you are "uncomfortable facts that we don't want to admit."

And when they come *from* you toward those that oppose Clinton and his blind supporters, they are in fact, mostly insults and lies.

24 posted on 09/17/2001 3:18:54 PM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: doug from upland
I learned my lesson. Attempting to have a discussion with someone still on his kneepads will accomplish nothing.

ROFL!!!

That's not funny. But I laughed anyway! Must have had some shock effect on me or something.

26 posted on 09/17/2001 3:20:46 PM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mugwort
ROFL again!!!!
27 posted on 09/17/2001 3:21:15 PM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: JeanS
All you need to know about the NY Times:

Quote:
... the Times's new publisher, Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr. Pinch was a sixties anti-war activist who famously declared that in a confrontation between an American and a North Vietnamese soldier he'd want to see the American get shot."
Unquote.
Stanley Kurtz (NRO on line, June 5, 2001)

29 posted on 09/17/2001 6:04:33 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
BTTT!
30 posted on 09/20/2001 11:12:24 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson