Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rebuild it, bigger (and put memorial on 200th floor, next to the anti-aircraft guns)
National Review Online ^ | Sept. 13, 2001 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 09/13/2001 12:40:18 PM PDT by seamus

Goldberg File

Rebuild It, Bigger
Infinitely preferable to another monuments.

September 13, 2001 2:20 p.m.

 

o be honest, I never liked the World Trade Center. I always thought it knocked the New York City skyline out of whack. The city looked more elegant when the Empire State Building was New York's (and the world's) tallest structure. Before the towers, the Big Apple looked like it fit perfectly in one of those shake-'em-up souvenir snowballs. The World Trade Center destroyed that bell-curve symmetry.

But, now that the barbarians have stolen the World Trade Center — and the lives of thousands of people in the process — one thing is certain to me: I want it back. More important, we need it back.

We can't bring back the dead, but we can rebuild the broken. In fact — to borrow a phrase from the Six Million Dollar Man — we can rebuild it better, faster, and stronger.

That would be infinitely preferable to another monument.

For more than a decade, America has been increasingly obsessed with wallowing in remorse. After various school shootings, the Oklahoma City bombing, Princess Di's untimely death, and a dozen other tragedies large and small, America — or more specifically American media and politicians — have fetishized grief. The television networks have devoted hundreds if not thousands of hours to asking victims or their families, "How do you feel?" Sometimes, you could almost hear the news producers high-five each other when interviewees wept openly. Sometimes I think the "B" in MSNBC stands for "Bathos."

President Clinton wasn't responsible for this trend but he did exploit it, as did many politicians. Alas, his "I feel your pain" lip biting was apparently what a lot of Americans wanted. Indeed, at times, it seemed that all political debates were lost or won based upon who was labeled "mean-spirited" or who could best claim the mantle of victimhood.

It looked to me that W. H. Auden's "For the Time Being," a prophetic poem from a half century-ago, had come true. Auden predicted that in the "New Age":

Knowledge will degenerate into a riot of subjective visions & Justice will be replaced by Pity as the cardinal human virtue, and all fear of retribution will vanish & The New Aristocracy will consist exclusively of hermits, bums and permanent invalids. The Rough Diamond, the Consumptive Whore, the bandit who is good to his mother, the epileptic girl who has a way with animals will be the heroes and heroines of the New Age, when the general, the statesman, and the philosopher have become the butt of every farce and satire.

Well, I for one want to go back to the Old Age, where Justice prevails over pity. President Bush had it right when he declared that this is a battle between Good and Evil. This isn't a conflict between those with low self-esteem and the victims of poor childhoods. Indeed, I think America's maudlin preoccupation was probably taken as a sign of weakness by those who attacked us.

But, other than delivering righteous retribution, the best way America can show that it's wiped away its tears and put steel in its spine is to rebuild the World Trade Center. A serious, dare I say manly, nation doesn't wallow. It dusts itself off, and gets up off the mat.

When the World Trade Center was first constructed it was the tallest building in the world. When it was destroyed, it was the fifth. America isn't fifth at anything worth being first at. It's time we had the tallest building in the world again.

This isn't a trivial pursuit. The quest to build the tallest structures goes back to the cathedrals of Europe, when the aim was to get as close to God as possible (which is why cathedrals are usually built on the highest ground). European capitals competed constantly to boast the tallest church spires. In fact, it's no coincidence that the word "spire" is the root word for inspire and aspire, because to look heavenward lifted not just your eyes, but your heart and soul, to marvel at what was possible.

Well, we need a lot of inspiration and aspiration. I don't think the government should necessarily rebuild the towers. America's greatness comes from the initiative of its people (the Empire State Building was the tallest building in the world — until the first trade center tower was completed in 1972 — because the founder of General Motors wanted to beat Walter Chrysler (creator of the Chrysler building) in a race to the sky. But surely the government can help by repealing the relevant taxes, cutting red tape, and lending any other help possible.

Regardless, America's enemies believe that we are a weak and soft nation, lacking the mettle to rise to this occasion. On the battlefront it looks like they were wrong. (John McCain: "I say to our enemies: We are coming. God may have mercy on you, but we won't.") And while the bravery of the rescue teams is indisputable, we need to do more on the home front to show our enemies were wrong in every regard.

America will find an appropriate way to mourn. But if we must have a shrine or monument for our remorse, let's put it on the 200th floor, right next to the antiaircraft guns.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
A gem of a patriotic column (that also has the only McCain quote I could stomach in the past year).
We must rise to this challenge, not shrink from it.
1 posted on 09/13/2001 12:40:19 PM PDT by seamus (jlakely@earthlink.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seamus
Bump.

I like Jonah. I heard him speak on CSPAN for a conservative college students' conference - and he was brilliant - much more than his day-to-day columns might indicate. And he's right about this. Very right.

2 posted on 09/13/2001 12:48:46 PM PDT by Mr. Bungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: seamus
Incidentally, the Sears tower is taller than the new Malaysian towers, as I recently learned. Apparently, They beat the published Sear heght only by including the base structure ofr broadcasting towers. When the comparable structures of the Sears tower are included, it still reigns.
4 posted on 09/13/2001 12:53:14 PM PDT by Henry F. Bowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamus
I agree. Rebuild and let the new building(s) stand as the monument. I personally like the symbolism of putting up only one tower as a "finger" to our enemies, but I agree, that lot cannot stand empty.
5 posted on 09/13/2001 12:53:23 PM PDT by RichInOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamus
But if we must have a shrine or monument for our remorse, let's put it on the 200th floor, right next to the antiaircraft guns.

This is the 21st Century. The Information Age supposedly renders such a centralized location in Manhatten unnecessary. IMHO, it would actually make a much more powerful statement to declare that we don't need to rebuild on that hallowed real estate. A memorial park would be appropriate.

6 posted on 09/13/2001 1:00:34 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamus
Change that to 3 towers, and I'm sold.
7 posted on 09/13/2001 1:02:28 PM PDT by Hawkeye's Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
It would be completely inappropriate to build on the same lot. This is the site of people's graves, a battlefield like Bull Run or Gettysburg. Minimal construction is allowed on these sites and the WTC site should be set aside as a plaza or park.

Rebuild the WTC if you must (IMO, the age of the mega skyscraper was finished on Tuesday) but the lot must be preserved as a memorial to the victims and their families. I believe this is already being discussed by state, city and federal officials.

8 posted on 09/13/2001 1:02:27 PM PDT by motexva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: seamus

9 posted on 09/13/2001 1:09:38 PM PDT by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: motexva
Why is it that we love to celebrate our defeats? If you go to Pearl Harbor, you will see the beautiful monument to the USS ARIZONA. Certainly a symbol of our greatest military defeat up until 1941. Next to it is anchored the USS MISSOURI , on whose deck the unconditional surrender of Japan was signed. This proud ship is kept there temporarily, supported by private gifts. Why is the DEFEAT more worth memorializing than the ultimate VICTORY??

This is a serious question.

11 posted on 09/13/2001 1:17:30 PM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seamus
When the WTC was built the NYC Fire Department said it was going to be impossible to fight a fire in it, or to evacuate the buildings in a short enough period of time when necessary. Politics ruled, the towers were built.

Watching the floors collapse one after the other from the mere weight of the floors above looks like improper design. I say the building was inherantly unsafe.

12 posted on 09/13/2001 1:17:31 PM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
There's lots of noise about "rebuild it" as though that was the governments job.  But it will be up to private investors to decide if it makes economic sense to build on that site, and if so, to build what? Maybe a big parking garage is what's really needed.
13 posted on 09/13/2001 1:17:36 PM PDT by DensaMensa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: motexva
It is not a grave site. With that thinking, London would have been one great big memorial.

I'm sure most if not all of the victims' relatives would like the towers rebuilt. What finer momument to all that have lost their lives.

14 posted on 09/13/2001 1:18:50 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seamus
Amen. Don't leave them with something they can thump their chest and say 'I did that'.

Wallowing in grief weakens us.

15 posted on 09/13/2001 1:25:27 PM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbb
Jonah's ideal has a certain very visceral appeal. He's certainly right that we don't need another memorial park and that rebuilding is the American thing to do.

Having said all that, you raise some interesting concerns. While electricity, for example, shouldn't be a problem, it seem sto me that a bigger issue might be finding tenants for the new, bigger WTC. Who would want to rent in an demonstrated terrorist target?

In short, if it can be made to work without government subsidies, rebuild bigger and better. Anything but another memorial.

16 posted on 09/13/2001 1:26:44 PM PDT by the bottle let me down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: seamus
This is a FUNDAMENTALLY bad idea,
Why give future terrorist the same target?
Anti aircraft weapons would have been of NO value in this attack whatsoever. A jumbojet shot down over New York at that hour would certainly have killed nearly as many people and would still have the propensity to level the buildings.
We may very well have whitnessed the end of the modern skyscraper as we know it. Corporate security leaders will advise spreading out liabilities instead of concentrating them into one small area. Whithout the support of corporate America the leasing situation of these buildings will become even more dismal than it is today.
These buildings will NOT be rebuilt, let alone bigger than they were. To do so would invite financial ruin for those involved and be a foolish display of arrogance, taunting the inevitable repeat of history.
17 posted on 09/13/2001 1:29:03 PM PDT by MooCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan, Victoria DelSoul, Luis Gonzalez
Your thoughts....
18 posted on 09/13/2001 1:30:24 PM PDT by MooCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
Watching the floors collapse one after the other from the mere weight of the floors above looks like improper design. I say the building was inherantly unsafe.

The building was not inherently unsafe. There was nothing improper in the design, indeed, it was so revolutionary in its time that countless skyscrapers imitated its engineering. The floors collapsed one after the other because NO BUILDING can sustain the pressure and weight of 20 floors collapsing. None.

And the floors did not collapse because of the "mere weight" of them. They collapsed because thousands of gallons of jet fuel burned a fire so hot that it melted the steel girders that supported it.

You really ought to know something about elemetary engineering and physics before declaring that just because a building collapses after an unthinkable catastrophic event it is "inherently unsafe."

19 posted on 09/13/2001 1:30:44 PM PDT by seamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Well, soon there will be a WWII memorial, de facto acknowledgement of our victory. And we don't have a victory yet in this war. You memorialize people who die like this because their lives and deaths are worth memorializing, as are the lessons one learns through prayer and meditation over events like WTC and PH.
20 posted on 09/13/2001 1:33:43 PM PDT by motexva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson