Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDICIAL WATCH BLAMES PRESIDENT BUSH FOR TERRORIST ATTACKS --Promises Investigation (mine)
Judicial Watch website ^ | September 12, 2001 | Larry Klayman

Posted on 09/12/2001 6:21:45 PM PDT by bayourod

GOVERNMENT INCOMPETENCE, LACK OF HONESTY WITH AMERICAN PEOPLE LEAD TO TERRORIST DISASTERS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

(Washington, DC, September 12, 2001) Larry Klayman, Chairman and General Counsel of Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today issued the following statement concerning the horrific terrorist attack on the United States, on a day – September 11, 2001 – that, even more than Pearl Harbor, will live in infamy.

“It is now apparent – given the near total lack of security at U.S. airports and elsewhere – that the U.S. government has not been forthright with the American people. During the last eight years of scandal during the Clinton administration, and the first eight months of the Bush Administration, reports this morning confirm that little to nothing was done to secure our nation’s airports and transportation systems as a whole – despite warnings.”

“Instead, cosmetic reform of education, social security, taxes, and other less important issues were given precedence. In addition, the American people were lead to believe that appropriate anti-terrorist counter measures were being taken. Instead of telling the truth so the problems could be addressed, politicians painted a rosy picture in order to be elected and re-elected.”

“Judicial Watch will use its investigative powers to look into the obvious breach of the people’s trust by a government which should not only have been candid, but also have taken steps to defend them.”

“Judicial Watch offers it condolences and sympathy to the dead and wounded, and their families, and prays that the nation will overcome this tragedy,” Klayman added.


TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-222 next last
To: All
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. Klayman fooled me more than once I'm ashamed to say. Never again. Lets stay on the subject. This not the time for cutting each other up.
201 posted on 09/13/2001 3:03:01 PM PDT by Wagonmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Thanks for posting that release from the ACLU.
President Clinton has made a statement very supportive of the President as has the organization founded by Alan Keyes.

I haven't seen Pat Buchanan's statement but I would be shocked if it too was not very supportive of President Bush.

Even some of our enemies (Cuba?) have issued supportive statements.

Klayman's animosity toward President Bush must run very deep. One poster suggested that he wants to run for President as a third party candidate.

202 posted on 09/13/2001 3:51:48 PM PDT by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Larry wants to run for President? Bad PR move here. Osama has probably read this letter with glee, though. We thought that cleaning up after Clinton was going to be bad, but the scope of our nation's fall is more than I can handle right now.

A relative of the man who died in the Pa. plane crash (after saying he was going to try to stop the hijacking) found comfort in knowing he didn't die in vain, that his actions may have saved the lives of others. We are involved in more than a culture war now. Larry's on the wrong side, IMHO.

203 posted on 09/13/2001 4:17:50 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: deport
Has Larry quit going after Bill Clinton?
204 posted on 09/13/2001 4:48:09 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I haven't seen any action against Clinton except that frivilous Peter Paul suit which was filed after Klayman was retained to defend Peter Paul in his criminal case.

ChaseR said on a recent post that he talked to Klayman on his radio show and that klayman said that they were going to be taking some action in the Loral case that was dismissed last year, but I would be surprised. There are statute of limitation problems.

205 posted on 09/13/2001 5:20:24 PM PDT by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I haven't seen any action against Clinton except that frivilous Peter Paul suit which was filed after Klayman was retained to defend Peter Paul in his criminal case.

ChaseR said on a recent post that he talked to Klayman on his radio show and that klayman said that they were going to be taking some action in the Loral case that was dismissed last year, but I would be surprised. There are statute of limitation problems.

206 posted on 09/13/2001 5:20:51 PM PDT by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

Comment #207 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour
You don't know a thing about me, who I support or don't support.

FYI, I have not advocated supporting Klayman financially for a LONG time. I have publically AGREED, on numerous occasions that Klayman's recent actions are wrong. I have had NO OBJECTION to those who CONFINED their criticism of him to those activities.

I do, however, dispute those, like Bayourod, who apparently think no crimes were committed in Filegate, Chinagate, the death of Foster, the death of Brown. He was just plain dishonest in his last post. Do you deny that? Furthermore, I dispute the contention that Klayman could have really done ANYTHING about the CRIMINAL matters his investigations uncovered. That was and STILL IS the responsibility of the DOJ. Do you dispute that?

And when you get done answering, PERHAPS we can get back to focusing on the THOUSANDS of dead Americans, what is currently happening and what we should do about it. Obviously, Klayman doesn't need any help fading into obscurity, does he?

208 posted on 09/13/2001 8:29:55 PM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
You are a sad and pathetic little man.
209 posted on 09/14/2001 12:23:19 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

Comment #210 Removed by Moderator

Comment #211 Removed by Moderator

Comment #212 Removed by Moderator

Comment #213 Removed by Moderator

To: Patriot76
#159 If President Bush *wanted* to go to Ground Zero, he would have been stopped--there are thousands of people designated to insure he is kept safe. This is the case for ALL presidents, not only the one you seem to dislike.

Our president has made very attempt to provide compassion and consolation to the victims, and he will do more in the future. Even the Democrats are supporting our president.

Just what is it you would expect him to do?

214 posted on 09/14/2001 4:17:55 AM PDT by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Patriot76
Actually that WP story treated Bush pretty kindly. Just as kindly as Clinton.

164 Posted on 09/12/2001 21:49:26 PDT by Patriot76

Wrong; they smack him every chance they get. OTOH, they will likely support him now, during this crisis, because it is the American thing to do.

Why not join the witless Peter Jennings, Tim Russert and other sorry bastards who do not support him?

215 posted on 09/14/2001 4:22:10 AM PDT by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: nmh
bump to your #178
216 posted on 09/14/2001 4:23:47 AM PDT by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
bump to your #188

Some of these posters apparently haven't heard that even the Democrats are supporting our president, at least publicly.

217 posted on 09/14/2001 4:26:38 AM PDT by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: katze
Even Iran is now said to be offering help. About the only countries left for Klayman solicit funds from are going to be North Korea and Afganistan.
218 posted on 09/15/2001 3:32:15 PM PDT by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
What the F---? Put a sock in it Klayman.
219 posted on 09/16/2001 9:33:38 AM PDT by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Don't forget to register for Judicial Watch's Ethics in Government 2001 International Conference Fighting Corruption, Fostering Freedom October 5 - 6 • Hotel Inter-Continental • Miami, Florida Invited Speakers Include:
Lady Margaret Thatcher
Michael Reagan
Governor Jeb Bush
Bill O’Reilly
Congressman Bob Barr
Ambassador Alan Keyes
Jose Basulto
Congressman Lincoln Diaz-Balart
Presidents of Brazil, Chile, etc.
Foreign Judges & Magistrates

Make sure to write to these people and make sure they are aware of this JW press release. Urge them strongly to not attend any JW events.
220 posted on 09/16/2001 10:02:29 AM PDT by MrFred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson