Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Catholic critique of a current notion of courtship
The University Concourse ^ | March 27, 2000 | Kathleen van Schaijik

Posted on 09/09/2001 7:41:23 PM PDT by independentmind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2001 7:41:23 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington, VeritatisSplendor (Mrs.), Bella_Bru, FITZ, savedbygrace,RLK, Don Myers
Bumping those who responded on the recent courtship thread.

IMO, the above offers a much better perspective on modern courtship, love and marriage.

2 posted on 09/09/2001 7:51:18 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allend, patent, Romulus
And a ping to the usual suspects.
3 posted on 09/09/2001 8:08:37 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
the kind of lack that entails a reduction and distortion of reality

Yes it's a better persepctive. Part of the problem with marriages today is that times have really changed, we live in an economy which makes it very hard for people to live those traditional roles. I knew a Korean man who was happily married to someone his parents chose for him when he was only 2 years old. He defended that way saying parents choose very carefully from families of the same background. He felt their way was more orderly than the American way where people date others from all different cultures and backgrounds and he pointed out they have a much lower divorce rate because compatibility is more ensured when the families are of the same social group.

4 posted on 09/09/2001 8:12:29 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
FUS = Franciscan University of Steubenville, in Steubenville, Ohio.
5 posted on 09/09/2001 8:16:44 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
bttt
6 posted on 09/09/2001 8:22:02 PM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
An interesting and complex article worth considering.

With regard to --- One of the things the speaker said was "Feelings don't really matter. Feelings come and go. What matters is compatibility." I've heard the same idea expressed many other times this way: "Love is not a feeling; it's a decision." --It sounds easy to misconstrue and end up in a drab lifetime relationship. A feeling needs to be there. However, that feeling must be a mature adult feeling. I don't have time to go into it further.

7 posted on 09/09/2001 9:04:31 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
As a 26-year old Catholic bachelor who has never had a girlfriend and has been unwilling to walk through the emotional minefield of the singles scene, I find the notion of courtship expressed in this article appealling in several ways. I have come to be sceptical of the notion of romantic love as the basis of finding a compatible marriage partner for two reasons:(a) it is a rationalization for impure thoughts and actions outside marriage--mental fornication, in other words and (b) it obscures the primacy of other qualities as mentioned in the article for a stable marriage. On a more pragmatic note, I find this method of quasi-arranged marriage fraught with far fewer emotional and spiritual dangers. As long as a man has a clear idea what he is looking for in a wife, it is much easier to find her. Moreover, he will not let passing emotions guide his judgment, with the attendant bad results that follow therefrom. Taking pragmatism even further, many traditionally-minded or conservative young Catholic men (and women) are all too aware how few like-minded Catholic women (and men) there are out there. There is not that large a selection for both sides to choose from, so we do have to choose carefully. I wish I had known about this movement years ago. But I'm just as happy to discovered it now.
8 posted on 09/09/2001 9:31:43 PM PDT by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
This is a great article. If the people who ran the Christian groups that I was involved with during my college years had understood these truths, I might still be in church.

WFTR
Bill

9 posted on 09/09/2001 9:49:02 PM PDT by WFTR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Excellent! Thank you!
10 posted on 09/10/2001 6:39:27 AM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
We, the human race, have managed to corrupt romance and dating as we have corrupted almost everything else we have touched. I can see where this approach would appeal to many people. Arranged marriages have been and are common in many societies.

I remember when I was about 10 or so, a man and his wife approached my mother. They knew me, and they volunteered to pay for my education in return for an understanding between me and their daughter. They said they knew me and wanted a good match for their daughter. My mother turned it down. I never did find out whose parents they were. I might have been interested, or not.

11 posted on 09/10/2001 7:30:26 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
As one newly facing the prospects of courtship (but not new to the idea), and facing a playing field where the ladies are still figuring out the rules, I have two under-addressed observations:

1. The rules are not adequately publicized. If a guy shows interest in a gal, but she does not return a show of interest (verboten in some courtship rule sets, regardless of her feelings), and he is unaware of these rules, he is likely to misinterpret her behavior and move on. I just participated in a denominational singles gathering, got frustrated by some of the odd behavior, and later discovered that the maidens were playing by a set of rules that the bachelors don't realize exist. If you don't publicize the rules, don't be surprised if would-be players leave the field.

2. Courtship presupposes a physically close community where individuals have easy exposure to each other in groups, and where elders are fully aware of those involved. In our spread-out culture where two interested parties can easily live hundreds of miles apart, the courtship process suffers as the "group date" requirement is very difficult to arrange. Finding enough about someone to decide to pursue formal courtship can be extremely difficult. Dating permits a discovery period which courtship presumes the community has already provided.

12 posted on 09/10/2001 8:11:05 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The following article is from the same site and is a response to the article posted above. It also is worth reading.

Reforming our thinking about courtship and sexuality

by William Craig

Kathleen van Schaijik's insightful article on dating and courtship addressed a topic of tremendous practical importance. Having worked full-time in the Pro-Life movement for the past eight years,I am convinced that fostering an authentically Christian view of human sexuality is critical in our battle against the Culture of Death.

The prevalent view on sexuality in our culture is essentially pagan. One could argue that the day has arrived, as hoped for by Alex Comfort--a leader of the sexual revolution and author of The Joy of Sex --"when we regard chastity as no more a virtue than malnutrition." Christians have an obligation not only to instill in their children a proper vision of human sexuality, but to act as salt and light to a world that is sinking ever deeper into a cesspool of carnal license. While some progress is discernible, especially with the recent proliferation of abstinence programs, much work remains to be done. Even these abstinence programs generally focus on avoiding sexual activity, and not on developing a true Christian ethic of human sexuality.

It is tragic that the "biblical approach" to courtship, which Mrs. Van Schaijik criticized, has emerged as the predominant Christian alternative to our culture's hedonistic dating and courtship rituals. While laudable in its intent, this approach does a disservice to its adherents by depriving them of the experience of discerning romantic feelings, developing self-control, and learning to interact emotionally in ways that will make them better spouses when the "Right One" comes along.

The Catholic Church's teaching on human sexuality and love is incomprehensibly beautiful. If that beauty is conveyed, dating and courtship rituals can be revolutionized to reflect the Gospel. Such a revolution would require several interrelated steps:

We must preach in the area of human sexuality faithfully and with passion. If we do not proclaim the Gospel as it relates to human sexuality, pop culture will fill the void. We have an obligation to preach the Truth, especially as it relates to these critical issues. God's message has a power that does not come from us, and He has placed these Truths deep within every human heart. Young people will respond to the truth and the beauty of our message if shared clearly and with passion. The Gospel is just as fresh and vibrant as ever.

We must preach and teach specifically on these topics. Unfortunately, our message on human sexuality is astonishingly counter-cultural. Even within the Catholic Church, we have experienced more than thirty years of a widespread belief that one can ignore Church teaching on sexual matters and still remain a "good Catholic." It is unlikely that a young Catholic has ever heard a single homily or discussion of the Church's teaching on any of these topics. It is incredibly important not only to expressly state the Church's teaching, but also to provide compelling arguments that further reflect "ever more clearly the biblical foundations, the ethical grounds and the personalistic reasons" behind these commandments of God given for our benefit. A brilliant example of this approach is Pope John Paul II's teaching on the Theology of the Body. We must address these subjects, especially in Catholic schools, Religious Education Programs, and in marriage preparation classes.

We must demonstrate a profound trust and respect for those facing these issues. Allowing young people to face these critical issues prior to marriage, as these situations naturally arise, can be a great opportunity for growth for them, despite the risks involved. Young people do not need to be told to avoid all intimacy, but rather, that with God's grace, they are capable of self-control, and that we feel that they can be trusted to develop emotionally in this area. Permitting "full" courtship and dating requires a great deal of parental interaction, supervision and communication.

We must develop a proper religious foundation in our children so as to prepare them for the challenges they will face in the future, including issues involving human sexuality. Parents must provide their children "an apprenticeship in self-denial, sound judgement, and self-mastery--the preconditions of all true freedom," in addition to educating them in the Faith. Children trained in these critical skills are well positioned to not only survive adolescence and the dating process unscathed, but to continue to grow in sanctity.

I pray that God raises up many from FUS who will accept the challenge to be leaders in bringing about this Catholic revolution in dating and courtship.


13 posted on 09/10/2001 9:47:54 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Thank you very much for posting this fine article, which happens to be exactly the kind of guidance I need in my life at this moment. Can you provide a link to the 'previous courtship thread' which you mention above?
14 posted on 09/10/2001 10:12:10 AM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I'm glad to see the generally favorable replies on this thread. Normally, I wouldn't post something like this on FR, but I did so as a response to this.
15 posted on 09/10/2001 11:04:40 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Agrarian Mercuria Kirk&Burke diotima sheltonmac Either/Or Askel5 UnBlinkingEye, Campion Moore Bo

16 posted on 09/10/2001 11:38:11 PM PDT by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eskimo Zviadist independentmind susangirl Twodees x CubicleGuy SamAdams76 MK Mark17 DoughtyOne junta

17 posted on 09/10/2001 11:40:25 PM PDT by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage, stand watie, LibertyGirl77 The_Expatriate Carol-HuTex MissAmericanPie arimus bigunreal

18 posted on 09/10/2001 11:41:22 PM PDT by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe, nunya bidness, Travis McGee, BurkeCalhounDabney KantianBurke abigail2 arcane mrustow

19 posted on 09/10/2001 11:43:48 PM PDT by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato LaBelleDameSansMerci PoisedWoman Rebeckie firebrand precisian A2J Derville Fiddlstix brat AnnaZ

20 posted on 09/10/2001 11:47:03 PM PDT by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson