Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 8th Circuit US Court of Appeals has RE-INSTATED Missouri's new Congressional map
8th Circuit ^ | 9/21/26

Posted on 09/21/2026 3:07:03 PM PDT by CFW

The Eighth Circuit ruled that Missouri must use its 2025 congressional map in November, holding that switching to the 2022 map after the August primary violates the Constitution. The court ordered entry of a permanent injunction, but paused it for one week.

The court held that Article I, Section 2 protects voters’ ability to participate in the selection of congressional nominees. Switching maps after the primary would leave some voters choosing among nominees they had no opportunity to select.

The court rejected arguments that the Supreme Court’s stay or approaching election deadlines made the appeal moot. It reached the constitutional merits without further discovery or hearings, finding that the dispute presented a purely legal question

The court declined to decide the Equal Protection and Elections Clause claims. Its ruling rests on Article I, Section 2 and does not resolve whether Missouri’s referendum process may ordinarily suspend a congressional redistricting law.

The district court must enter a permanent injunction, but administratively stay it until September 28 at 5 p.m. Central to allow Supreme Court review. The Eighth Circuit ordered its mandate to issue immediately.

Judge Stras dissented in part, arguing that the intervenors lacked standing to appeal because their referendum remains on the ballot and they showed no personal injury from using the 2025 map. He would have dismissed the appeal without reaching the constitutional merits.

(Excerpt) Read more at drive.google.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: 8thcircuit; courts; elections; flipflopcourts; missouri

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Ping, pong, ping!
1 posted on 09/21/2026 3:07:03 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

Good or bad for GOP?


2 posted on 09/21/2026 3:09:09 PM PDT by blueyon (God, is who we need)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

There ya go.


3 posted on 09/21/2026 3:09:51 PM PDT by Merrick (It's a car - that runs on water, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

On balance, good.


4 posted on 09/21/2026 3:11:07 PM PDT by Merrick (It's a car - that runs on water, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

“Good or bad for GOP?”

This appears to be a ruling of law and does not reference, so far as I can tell, who it favors. I’d hope someone would answer that as who among us is so familiar with the case that we’d know who it favors? Anyone know?


5 posted on 09/21/2026 3:13:24 PM PDT by Gen.Blather (Oh, gosh! I said that out loud. I'm so sorry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

It puts SCOTUS in a shitty place. The cowards argued that Trump’s USPS voter verification is LIKELY to succeed on merits, but said it was too late in the election season to upset the apple cart now (after letting the liberal justices and liberal Courts delay it repeatedly) - and the 8th US Circuit is saying, “oh yeah, too late to upset the apple cart, then I guess you *HAVE* to ignore this appeal until *AFTER* the election based on your most recent ruling, don’t you?”

The 8th Circuit put SCOTUS in the bed they made. The only hope the appellants have is to say the 8th Circuit acted too late - but the 8th Circuit already said *that* about the appellants.


6 posted on 09/21/2026 3:14:55 PM PDT by Merrick (It's a car - that runs on water, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

“This appears to be a ruling of law and does not reference, so far as I can tell, who it favors. I’d hope someone would answer that as who among us is so familiar with the case that we’d know who it favors? Anyone know?”


This favors the GOP. Definitely!


7 posted on 09/21/2026 3:15:08 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Well the ACLU was on the losing side.


8 posted on 09/21/2026 3:15:37 PM PDT by Williams (Thank God for the election of President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

JD Vance directly called for this just days ago while in Missouri: “When you have courts that say that Missouri is not allowed to draw its districts the way that it would like to, but certain blue states are, what that means is that those courts are saying that the votes of a Missouri Republican or a Missouri Independent count less than a Massachusetts Democrat.”

“You could have people who are going in the general election and casting ballots in districts that are different than the ballots that they cast just a couple of months ago in the primary. That, to me, is an affront to the democratic process.”


9 posted on 09/21/2026 3:16:08 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Are people really not up on this? The 2025 map redraws Missouri congressional districts to favor an additional GOP seat. Not guarantee it - no redraws guarantee anything - but the likely result was an additional R from Missouri.

Democrats let election season - for a *2025* redraw - go all the way through primaries, then filed to overturn the redraw from the year before to get their seat back.


10 posted on 09/21/2026 3:17:06 PM PDT by Merrick (It's a car - that runs on water, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

An AI sources, when asked which party this ruling favors, says:

The Republican Party.

The 8th Circuit’s ruling reinstating Missouri’s 2025 congressional map is widely seen as a major boost to Republicans, who stand to flip longtime Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver’s Kansas City–based 5th District, potentially shifting Missouri’s House delegation from 6–2 to 7–1 in favor of the GOP.

The map was drawn at the urging of President Donald Trump as part of a national redistricting push to help Republicans maintain their slim House majority in the November midterms.


11 posted on 09/21/2026 3:18:00 PM PDT by onthelookout777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/21/missouri-map-ruling-midterms-01086519


12 posted on 09/21/2026 3:29:54 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

republicans favored one seat


13 posted on 09/21/2026 3:30:40 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CFW

It’s on , off , on ,off , on ,LOL


14 posted on 09/21/2026 3:37:09 PM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The Kansas City ballot-stuffing machine is deeply saddened.


15 posted on 09/21/2026 3:51:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The right of Democrats to embezzle elections shall not be infringed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Apparently it’s heading back to the SC and you know which way the ruling will swing! So DON’T celebrate just yet as you know the TDS ROBERTS CABAL will strike again!


16 posted on 09/21/2026 4:08:13 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Merrick

POS JohnRoberts is by definition shitty ..


17 posted on 09/21/2026 4:33:59 PM PDT by A strike (fvckMI6 Drool Britannia & No more Dots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather; blueyon

If I got the state correctly, they eliminated their 1 blue district by realigning two or three districts to the south and eastern of the blue district, and then merging the blue district into the two red districts. On balance all districts are proportional. Whether the formerly one blue district will be diluted enough to be outvoted remains to be seen. It could backfire and create two blue districts. Depends on turnout and how people vote overall - which is technically true in every district but since the state’s goal was to eliminate a blue seat - we’ll see.


18 posted on 09/21/2026 4:39:00 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Merrick
Democrats let election season - for a *2025* redraw - go all the way through primaries, then filed to overturn the redraw from the year before to get their seat back.

That's not correct. A citizen group turned in a petition with the required number of signatures in early December, 2025. The group filed legal action after Secretary of State Hoskins waited months to rule (on August 4th) that the petition is void because congressional redistricting plans cannot be subject to voter referendums in Missouri.

Except that's not the case. The Missouri Supreme Court has ruled (once in dicta, once in a holding) that the referendum process applies to ANY act of the Missouri Legislature.

19 posted on 09/21/2026 4:56:11 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Thank Denny Hoskins. Do like that red jacket he wears!


20 posted on 09/21/2026 4:57:35 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson