Posted on 06/19/2026 4:41:51 PM PDT by little jeremiah
"Before they raped me, they would chant, “In the name of Allah.”
The first known Pakistani Muslim rape grooming gang incident in the UK took place in 1955 and involved Pakistanis in Bradford and a 15-year-old girl. As the latest grooming gang inquiry notes, this took place after the British Nationality Act 1948 enabled mass migration to the UK.
More cases involving girls as young as 11 years old began to pop up in the sixties, often centering around Bradford, with headlines such as “Girl Mauled by Pakistani in Trafalgar Square” (1961) and “Pakistani Indecent Assault on 11 year old in Leicester” (1962) and then on through the years and the decades of Islamic systemic trafficking of underage girls in the UK.
The latest inquiry into the Muslim sex grooming gangs conducted by MP Rupert Lowe estimates 250,000 as a low figure for the number of mostly white English girls assaulted in 149 districts making up nearly 40% of such districts in the UK. in which the perpetrators range from a British Muslim ‘lord’ to police officers, taxi drivers and restaurateurs who helped traffic the victims.
The 70 years of Muslim rape gangs represent not just individual crimes or even gang crimes, but a systemic ‘Rape Jihad’ akin to the systematic Muslim sexual assaults during the Armenian genocide, the mass abductions of women and girls from Europe under the Ottoman Empire, the Hamas sexual assaults of Oct 7, and the sexual assaults on Iranian protesters by ‘police’.
As the report notes, “250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.”
The 219-page report makes it clear that these attacks were driven by a cultural ‘honour- and shame-based clan code’ among Pakistanis and other Muslims, as well as by “theological and legal aspects of Islam” that demand “enmity towards non-Muslims”, “a system of sex slavery that authorises sexual relations with non-Muslim captives, and a religiously sanctioned social hierarchy that subjugates conquered non-Muslims.” These are the essentials of Islamic life.
“Before they raped me, they would chant, ‘In the name of Allah the most merciful,’” one victim described. In other cases, “perpetrators shouted ‘Allahu Akbar’ and boasted of racial supremacy.”
Victims of the Muslim rape gangs testified that the perpetrators justified the abuses in Islamic terms. “Many times I was told that the Quran says, ‘If one of your wives disobeys you, beat her. This was often quoted to me before they beat me with their hands. They believed they had a position of religious moral superiority over ‘nonbelievers.’ They believed it was their duty to punish us, as they believed that doing so made them good Muslims.”
This is the same thing that the girls raped by ISIS reported. A 12-year-old Yazidi girl enslaved by ISIS remembers her Muslim rapist telling her that his rape is an act of worship and that by raping her, “he is drawing closer to Allah.” Another told a 15-year-old girl that his rape is a “prayer to Allah.” But ISIS sex slavery has been happening all along across the UK.
Some of the victims in the UK were put through Islamic ‘marriage’ ceremonies in the presence of Imams and received ‘conversion certificates’ from mosques before they were raped.
But this systemic assault on hundreds of thousands of women and girls could not have happened without the complicity of leading Muslim and non-Muslim government officials.
The latest inquiry points the finger at London Mayor Sadiq Khan and even the prime minister, noting that “while Sir Keir Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions, it has been reported that 13,000 suspected rape gang members and paedophiles were let off with warning letters.”
The report mentions Lord Nazir Ahmed who was “convicted in 2022 of multiple child sex offences, including rape of a 13-year-old girl” and noted that “survivors described him as part of the same networks that enabled Rotherham’s grooming gangs” with thousands of victims.
The cover-up of the systemic assaults and trafficking was equally systemic with the media teachers, police officers, social workers and medical professionals choosing to look away from the assaults, from severe genital trauma in little girls, from trafficking hubs in social services settings, from Muslim police officers warning victims and parents not to report the assaults.
One victim who was forcibly converted, forced to learn the Koran and undergo eight forced abortions, tried to report what was happening to the police. “She was interviewed by a Muslim officer who switched off the tape recorder and instructed her to drop her allegations because of ‘lack of evidence.’ She later learned that this officer was imprisoned for child sex offences.”
Some girls who may have been trafficked to Muslim countries are likely lost beyond recovery.
Muslim and allied police officers and social workers reported the girls to the gangs who then committed horrifying abuses to make examples out of them. “One of the worst punishments I ever witnessed involved another girl who was accused of reporting one of the men to the police… I then witnessed an iron being used on the girl’s back while it was hot. I remember seeing severe burns and skin damage to her back. My recollection is that the girl later died. I remember seeing her being strangled afterwards in that room.”
And the cover-up still continues. Even though the report notes that “87% of those convicted in these group-based child sexual exploitation cases bore distinctively Muslim names”, the Starmer government and UK elites continue to deny the Islamic component of the assaults.
The report confirms that “the overwhelming majority of the rape gang networks consisted entirely of men from Muslim backgrounds – predominantly of Pakistani heritage, although smaller groups from Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, and other Muslim origins were also involved.” The assaults were motivated by racial and religious prejudices with the victims taunted about their race and religion. One victim was “mocked for wearing a cross and being told that ‘her Christian faith offered her no protection.’” Not in the UK, it certainly didn’t.
One single racially motivated rape of a Muslim would have set the UK on fire with investigations, trials and huge prison sentences. Yet over 250,000 Muslim rapes of non-Muslims who were told that they were worthless “white trash” or “kuffar” have led to little except more cover-ups.
And there is every reason to believe that the Mohammed Class in the UK is getting away with it.
This isn’t mere crime. This is a systemic ethnic cleansing in which the perpetrators target a racial and religious group by going after its women and girls, and enslave or convert them similar to the ‘Love Jihad’ in India or the abductions of Christian girls by Muslims in Nigeria.
This is genocide.
The earliest reported Pakistani Muslim sexual assault on an English girl took place in 1850. The earliest known Muslim sex grooming gang assault happened in 1955. 70 years later it’s still going on. The Mohammed Class is still raping girls just like these somehow across the UK.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
remembers her Muslim rapist telling her that his rape is an act of worship and that by raping her, “he is drawing closer to Allah.”
This guy is a very very sick in the head person
The UK government is responsible for that, as much as the moronic savages who did it. I don’t understand why they are so passionate about turning the UK muslim.
Who were the politicians that voted the British Nationality Act of 1948 into law?
Don’t know. No doubt all dead now.
Islam is an ideology of conquest. Rape is one of their weapons, throughout history. Only the Muslim leaders who seriously want to join civilization are okay, such as Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia.
The current British leaders are (a) Globalists, (b) Evil. Hopefully Nigel Farage will win an election, and there are some others MPs who hate what’s happened and happening. The political system there is mindbogglingly complicated. Also, “King” Charles is no doubt a Muslic convert.
I have mentioned this before. And I’ll continue to do so until the mods tell me to shut up.
The British monarch can fairly be described as the custodian of the nation. And I get that the monarch reigns, but does not rule.
Yet the royals say nothing as hundreds of thousands of English girls are raped. No public comment. No public stance, as indirect as it might be.
Instead they all grin and wave from palace balconies, like they’re in a Monty Python skit.
Their total inaction here is a disgrace.
It’s nothing but brainwashing , slavery , sex and murder
I agree with that.
Technically — as you implied — the monarch is on delicate ground and ought not to get involved in politics. But this does seem like a special circumstance. I can’t quite see King Charles III taking the step, but I think it would be great, at some point in the future, if King William IV were to do the unthinkable and make a big speech urging the British people to take back their country and to throw the invaders out. It’s pretty much make or break time over there — so somebody ought to make the effort.
anything from the british press even acknowledging the rape report?
They don’t want British children, do they. So much for the English not being slaves.
And conquest. Best short history of Islam:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y
Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret, by Dr Bill Warner
He and others have a website, Political Islam, great content for anyone who wants to know more.
https://www.cspii.org/
Center for the Study of Political Islam International
51% of Islamic doctrinal texts is about politics. The goal of these politics is the submission of all people to Mohammed and Allah.
For over 1,400 years, submission to Mohammed and Allah changed many cultures to an Islamic one. Now, knowing the doctrine and tactics of Political Islam, we can help prevent its expansion with the intent of avoiding violence and human suffering.
About Us
The CSPII (Center for the Study of Political Islam International) is an independent non-profit research and educational organization. Our concern is with the ideological doctrine of Islam that relates to Kafirs (non-Muslims), and, therefore, is political. We define this part of the doctrine as “Political Islam”.
We analyze Islamic primary doctrine, and its continuous, harmful political impact on individuals and governments. We use scientific methods, rational thought and fact-based reasoning to show how the influence of Political Islam exponentially spreads within non-Islamic countries, creating the economic, legal and sociocultural foundation to turn them into Islamic ones.
CSPII informs and educates about the existential threat Political Islam poses to our civilizations with the aim to peacefully prevent its domination over people’s lives.
It’s not stupidity on the part of the British government. It’s evil.
We had our own: Senator Edward Kennedy, who assured the public that his immigration bill of 1965 encouraging non-white, non-Christian mass immigration, would not change America's fundamental values:
“The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants,” lead supporter Sen. Edward ‘Ted’ Kennedy (D-Mass.) told the Senate during debate. “It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”

...And what he said:
I remember him! Thank you. I hope you are well. We’re all gettin’ old!
Thanks for this information. Edward Kennedy was ... not good for the country.
Looks as though King Charles converted to Islam. I hope he abdicates soon and lets William take over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.