In the 1996 election (my first Presidential), the Washington Times article noted Clinton scored with a women’s vote while losing men.
Modern liberals are keeping this anti-male attitude everywhere. They don’t care if they lose men. Get dominant women’s votes to win.
You see this in church, where a postmodern church focuses on getting women but never men. Worship songs are heavily feminine in nature, and they target women never men. At the church that ran me out, it’s now women who sing. No young men even sing in that church because they’ve taught singing is for girls only since the songs are heavily sappy. The record labels target 25-45 women for worship songs. Sermonettes work that way too. The Academy Awards (which leave television after 2028) aims their audience towards women.
As a society, we focus on women that we ignore men deliberately. It’s seen on television, churches, radio, music, media, everywhere. Trump took advantage of the anti-male attitudes everywhere. It’s why Pete Hegseth as Secretary of War offends the Left — a heavily masculine news show such as Fox & Friends with two tough men offends most news shows that are distaff-dominated.
OTOH, did you see the mention of a UFC bout on the south lawn of the White House?
As the author said, it oughtta be a doozy! LOL!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFC_White_House
The other good line from that article is
"(Trump) masculinized the Republicans and feminized the Democrats."
As proposed to progressives in Benjamin Kidd's book, The Science of Power, published in 1910, just before adoption of the 19 Amendment.