And check out this crazy:
Posted on 01/14/2026 8:30:27 AM PST by Rummyfan
"Being a male is a matter of birth. Being a man is a matter of choice." —Edwin Louis Cole
The day the Democratic Party lost testicle #1 was in 2016. They limped by for another eight years and severed part #2 in the summer of 2024.
Both times, the root cause of its neutering was exactly the same: The Dems tried to rig a presidential election to help a female candidate.
Historians, I suspect, will credit the Democratic Party’s PR emasculation to two events. The first was rigging the 2016 primaries in favor of Hillary Clinton.
All the grassroots liberals wanted Bernie Sanders. It was the “corporations and billionaires” (boo, hiss) who backed Clinton.
That was the moment when left-wing activists lost faith in their party’s integrity. It created an us-versus-them mentality — and incentivized calls for a socialist takeover.
Few recognized it at the time, but in retrospect, that was when the Democratic Party’s ethos changed forever.
The second castration was eerily similar to the first: Once again, to favor a female candidate, the Democratic Party rigged its 2024 nomination process so Vice President Kamala Harris would cruise to victory without winning a single primary, caucus, or statewide vote.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
In the 1996 election (my first Presidential), the Washington Times article noted Clinton scored with a women’s vote while losing men.
Modern liberals are keeping this anti-male attitude everywhere. They don’t care if they lose men. Get dominant women’s votes to win.
You see this in church, where a postmodern church focuses on getting women but never men. Worship songs are heavily feminine in nature, and they target women never men. At the church that ran me out, it’s now women who sing. No young men even sing in that church because they’ve taught singing is for girls only since the songs are heavily sappy. The record labels target 25-45 women for worship songs. Sermonettes work that way too. The Academy Awards (which leave television after 2028) aims their audience towards women.
As a society, we focus on women that we ignore men deliberately. It’s seen on television, churches, radio, music, media, everywhere. Trump took advantage of the anti-male attitudes everywhere. It’s why Pete Hegseth as Secretary of War offends the Left — a heavily masculine news show such as Fox & Friends with two tough men offends most news shows that are distaff-dominated.
When did the rats ever have their “manhood”? I must have missed that.
He said it better than I did, but that was the gist of his remark.
OTOH, did you see the mention of a UFC bout on the south lawn of the White House?
As the author said, it oughtta be a doozy! LOL!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFC_White_House
The other good line from that article is
"(Trump) masculinized the Republicans and feminized the Democrats."
As proposed to progressives in Benjamin Kidd's book, The Science of Power, published in 1910, just before adoption of the 19 Amendment.
Luckily for us, they seem too stupid to understand that their strategy of demonizing white men doesn't leave them with enough of a demographic base to actually win elections - you still need a sizeable fraction of straight white males to win many states or Congressional districts. Alternatively, they do recognize that they need this demographic, but are just too blinkered and pig-headed to see that you can't heap the most vile rhetoric on a group of people and expect them to vote for your party and candidates.
By the looks of most dim women their men don’t need any balls for their original purpose.
Bkmk
We lead bulls around by nose rings in Texas.
“Progressive Democrats are all about giving the finger to anyone who is white, male,”
While at the same time bowing down to violent muslim men and culture going so far as to ‘submit’ to Islam wearing head scarves. AND, they are out chasing cars like dogs protecting violent rapists and chomos from ICE.
Bet none of her pets ever hang around long.
Honestly, it was in January, 1993, when Bill Clinton immediately conceded real control of his office to his "co-President". Systematic removal of actual men from both the Democratic Party and the Federal Government began that Spring.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.