Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUTRAGE ON CAPITOL HILL: Rogue Judges Boasberg and Boardman Now Refuse to Testify Before the Senate
Gateway Pundit ^ | December 01, 2025 | Jim Hᴏft

Posted on 12/01/2025 10:59:32 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2025 10:59:32 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Send a strongly worded letter.


2 posted on 12/01/2025 11:01:53 AM PST by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
And what will the senate do about it?

My guess is not one damned thing.

3 posted on 12/01/2025 11:02:34 AM PST by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s a separation of powers matter. Congress has no oversight authority over the courts, and it is in the interest of American businesses to have a functioning federal court system.


4 posted on 12/01/2025 11:06:01 AM PST by Bob Wills is still the king
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Let me guess. Another federal judge will declare federal judges are protected by “separation of powers”


5 posted on 12/01/2025 11:07:02 AM PST by Organic Panic ('Was I molested. I think so' - Ashley Biden in response to her father joining her in the shower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Contempt of Congress, followed by a request to DOJ to prosecute.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander


6 posted on 12/01/2025 11:08:07 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Why is this a big deal? They were invited, it says (not a subpoena?) and they refused.

So what. If there was no legal obligation, why would them saying no be significant?


7 posted on 12/01/2025 11:09:13 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s time the FBI investigated that little commie biatch, Bonusburger. He’s a pig and has drawn a bead on every American in America. Bass turd.


8 posted on 12/01/2025 11:10:51 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I started watching FNC again when Trump got elected. I'm done watching again after today's crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryCrow

They should hold slimey Boasberg in contempt and issue an order of suspension of duties until he complies. Make him show up in court. In the meantime. The senate should subpoena his business and personal emails for conversation related to Trump and the other victims for time frame leading up to these bogus witch hunts.


9 posted on 12/01/2025 11:10:51 AM PST by BOBWADE (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Speaking of the “Senate”, did Chrissy Van Hollen elope with Kilmar the Abrego Kid yet?


10 posted on 12/01/2025 11:13:31 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I started watching FNC again when Trump got elected. I'm done watching again after today's crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

BS. OUTAGE of spines and balls.


11 posted on 12/01/2025 11:14:45 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Wills is still the king
Congress has no oversight authority over the courts....

True in a larger sense, however, it can impeach and remove a judge. The actions in this instance just might warrant impeachment.

12 posted on 12/01/2025 11:17:39 AM PST by frog in a pot (Islam - the peaceful "Submit or Die" religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Next time subpoena them - make it INvoluntary for them to show up and explain themselves. And if they plead the 5th, the implications are clear that they know that they did something wrong.


13 posted on 12/01/2025 11:19:49 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Wills is still the king
“Congress has no oversight authority over the courts…”

Congress approves the judiciary budget each year. Apart from cutting the judges’ salaries, Congress can increase or decrease the judiciary's budget. And Congress has the authority to set the jurisdiction of the District Courts, and historically it has done so. In fact, reforms to the Judiciary Act to restrict the issuance of nationwide injunctions against the President are desperately needed.

14 posted on 12/01/2025 11:20:39 AM PST by Stingray51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GaryCrow
And what will the senate do about it?

Issue an apology for asking!

15 posted on 12/01/2025 11:20:58 AM PST by sjmjax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
These reprobates need to be brought up before the court of last resort, the court whose verdict is always final, and from which there is no appeal.

16 posted on 12/01/2025 11:21:08 AM PST by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen
So what. If there was no legal obligation, why would them saying no be significant?

This was another stupid PR stunt by the Stupid Party.

This "hearing" has no legitimate legislative purpose. And the GOP majority did not have the balls to compel appearance with a subpoena, BECAUSE the hearing had no legitimate legislative purpose, and such a subpoena would have been quashed in. a nanosecond.

The Senate has the power to TRY Judges Boasberg and Boardman, and if convicted remove them from the bench - EXCEPT THEY HAVEN'T BEEN IMPEACHED BY THE HOUSE.

A "hearing" to "expose" anything is illegitimate, and I wouldn't blame any court including the USSC to issue an order forbidding it.

Congress may need a time out to recover some sense of its role and its purpose.

There actually IS a Constitutional way for the Republicans to allow the President to dismiss Congress - but the GOP would never go for it.

17 posted on 12/01/2025 11:23:30 AM PST by Jim Noble (Let it turn to something else, Matty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

meh, outrage? is that it?

The plug in he swamp remans very tight.


18 posted on 12/01/2025 11:24:24 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Impeaches and Cream.

Give it to them.


19 posted on 12/01/2025 11:24:34 AM PST by Candor7 (Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Our congressional rep was at church on Sunday. A friend ask him straight up, "When are you people going to start sending some of these criminal dims to jail." His response was: "No, never!"

So, you can forget ever sending any of these criminals, judges, to jail or losing their jobs. The weak-kneed, no-balls republicans and RINOs WILL NOT do it. Simple as that. Even though they know the commies will do it to them when they next get into control!!!

20 posted on 12/01/2025 11:25:18 AM PST by RetiredArmy (The Bible speaks truth! Don't believe it, you do so at your own peril. You'd better be right!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson