Posted on 11/11/2025 4:06:18 PM PST by CFW
ROLLINS, SEC. OF AGRIC., ET AL. V. RI COUNCIL OF CHURCHES, ET AL. The application for stay presented to Justice Jackson is referred to the Court. The administrative stay entered on November 7, 2025, is hereby extended until 11:59 p.m. (EST) on November 13, 2025.
Justice Jackson would deny the request for extension of the administrative stay and would deny the application
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Since when do the tyrants in black robes appropriate funds for the US Government?
I think they are hoping for mootness and the circuit court is hoping it goes that way also. They will drag their feet because they know that the district judge is wrong but they don’t want to be the ones to overrule. They know if they don’t overrule, they will be slapped down by SCOTUS.
I notice Jackson would deny it, but neither Kagan nor Sotomayor joined her. I don’t imagine she ever feels lonely.
“I think they are hoping for mootness and the circuit court is hoping it goes that way also. They will drag their feet because they know that the district judge is wrong but they don’t want to be the ones to overrule. They know if they don’t overrule, they will be slapped down by SCOTUS.”
I suspect you are spot on.
Well, I think it will be moot as of Thursday when the government reopens and funding is restored to SNAP with the CR, which is likely why they extended it to Thursday. They would rather not touch the case, and two days isn't going make much of difference either way.
Pretty sure it will be the latter.
Exactly. Settle it as per its constitutionality. That’s your job, Justices.
“but the rogue lower court federal judges are unlikely to face any discipline.”
They never do.
Traitor Roberts has lost control of the Fed. Judiciary, if it was ever under control.
It’s totally spinning out of control and about to auger in.
Yes.
When has Scotus ever slapped down a judge?
The entire system should be scrapped. My mother lived through the depression and raised 6 kids on powdered milk Tang, Oatmeal and tuna casserole.These welfare queens need a wake up call.
In this case, they seek to evade the wrath of the murderous mobs !
Everyone needs to back out of the political angle for half a second.
Here’s why:
It is unconstitutional and illegal for any country, state, business, organization or individual to insert funding into any specific FEDERAL agency or project.
If anyone wants to give money to the federal government, they write a check or transfers funds ONLY into the US Treasury.
From there, Article I of the Constitution takes over and congress appropriates funding out of the treasury with absolutely zero adherence to any intended targeting of said funding from the contributor.
Can you imagine the wild weasel slush fund government without Constitutional structure for appropriations? The entire government would be a result of “donations” to pet projects or interests.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.