Posted on 10/06/2025 6:44:28 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Would ANTIFA antics would be found to violate this statute? I am guessing the courts would operate under the current two-tier system and ANTIFA would be permitted to do as they please.
Musk will move “X” out of CA so fast your head will spin.
islam is a totalitarian death cult founded by a child rapist.
And trannies are wack.
Every perversion under the sun will get a pass. Anybody promoting traditional monogamous marriage and families or speaking ill of rampant perversions will get shut down.
How can SCOTUS not tackle this?
Your guess would be correct.
I've read otherwise.
And I don't use fascist lightly, I don't mean 'meanies I don't like'. I mean the political ideology which is basically communist BUT it allows private ownership of property and, crucially, industry but only under complete government control. For examples of modern fascist states - see China. They still say they are communist (CCP) but really they have private property so that's a lie. They are fasist, so is California, or it aspires to be.
And trannies are wack.
That's two strikes against you! You must repent on both counts. Repeat after me: "Islam is right about trannies and homosexuals."
Californians are a lost cause and hopeless, it would be better a huge 8+ quake hit there to shake some sense into them, might be the only thing that wakes them up.
This is just feel good tactics by the California Legislature. Any attempt to enforce it will be struck down very quickly. There have been numerous court decisions that have shown the First Amendment to be absolute. The state pornography laws were killed decades ago, as were Red Scare era attempts to suppress Communist newspapers and broadcasts.
Try checking the prices of flights to Caracas and Havana on say Air Canada and Kayak. You can’t.
Flights to the UK could be cut off in the same way.
Trump tariffs that a judge might strike down could be replaced by secondary sanctions on the UK.
We need to fight for free speech in the UK.
UK insanity tends to head west across The Pond.
Members of the California legislature should bear in mind that a judge could enforce Section 3 of Amendment XIV.
“islam is right about trannies and homosexuals.”
“islam is right about trannies and homosexuals.”
“islam is right about trannies and homosexuals.”
Do I also have to buy an Indulgence and / or prostrate myself to them?
Could be painful…
Good post. Agree with you 100%.
Of course not. Like “common sense gun laws” which means they keep theirs but take ours, it would be selectively enforced.
That’s how dem law works. Du-ohh!
“When fascism comes, it will come in the name of anti-fascism.”
Huey Long
Since this website is based in the golden state one wonders how long it would last under this new law
Blatant first amendment violation.
This will not stand the scrutiny of the Federal courts...if it even gets that far.
Already done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.