Posted on 08/13/2025 12:40:15 PM PDT by karpov
Who are these “editors” and why do we care what they think is acceptable?
Public editorial masturbation is unbecoming of The National Review.
Maybe we can get them to throw Hunter Biden’s old job back in on a deal.
That will mean reiterating Western support for Ukraine and stipulating that the U.S. will participate in that effort, even as Western Europe assumes — as it must — a greater share of responsibility for helping Ukraine out.What part of 'no' don't these people understand?! Hegseth, Vance and Trump have all said 'no' but NATO's plans require the US to provide security guarantees for Ukraine, so that when NATO/Ukraine stage a false flag or provoke Putin, the US HAS TO FIGHT RUSSIA. No. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. When will they accept reality?
“ Who are these “editors” and why do we care what they think is acceptable?”
“ In 2022, after eight years of intermittent fighting in Ukraine’s east, Russia initiated a full-scale invasion, with the aim of reducing a rump Ukraine to a satrapy”
That has George Will’s name written all over it.
any peace deal between Ukraine and Russia would have to include the removal of Zelensky and his band of Obama/Hillary installed mob bosses ( remember not to fire the prosecutor this time if you want peace )
Judson Berger
Judson Berger is the managing editor of National Review Online.
Mark Antonio Wright
Mark Antonio Wright is the executive editor of National Review.
Luther Ray Abel
Luther Ray Abel is the Nights & Weekends Editor for National Review. A veteran of the U.S. Navy, Luther is a proud native of Sheboygan, Wis.
Robert VerBruggen
Robert VerBruggen is a contributing editor for National Review and a fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
Philip Klein
Philip Klein is the editor of National Review Online.
David Pryce-Jones is a British author and commentator and a senior editor of National Review.
Ramesh Ponnuru
Ramesh Ponnuru is the editor of National Review, a columnist for the Washington Post, and a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Rich Lowry
Rich Lowry is the editor in chief of National Review.
Richard Brookhiser
Historian Richard Brookhiser is a senior editor of National Review and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.
Andrew C. McCarthy
Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.
Ross Douthat
Ross Douthat is a National Review contributing editor.
Charles C. W. Cooke
Charles C. W. Cooke is a senior editor at National Review and the host of The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast.
Shannen W. Coffin
Shannen W. Coffin, a contributing editor to National Review, practices appellate law in Washington, D.C.
Jack Butler
Jack Butler is submissions editor at National Review Online, a 2023–2024 Leonine Fellow, and a 2022–2023 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow at the Fund for American Studies.
Who are you, and why should anyone care what you think either?
Everyone has opinions. Whether those opinions have any value is dependent upon what they say, and what arguments they make, not whose opinion it is.
Never Trumpers at the National Review have no credibility.
The National Review is as conservative as Obama. Remember this?
Barack Obama, conservative Washington Post, 22 November 2019The whole game of the non-US NATO types is to corral President Trump into promising that "policing." And this nation paying the lion's share for it.
Ukraine declares itself neutral re organizes its armed forces along Swiss military lines & arms itself to the teeth
Ukraine declares itself neutral re organizes its armed forces along Swiss military lines & arms itself to the teeth
Yes. Our voices will be silenced and our opinions crushed sooner or later.
“In 2022, after eight years of intermittent fighting in Ukraine’s east, Russia initiated a full-scale invasion, with the aim of reducing a rump Ukraine to a satrapy”
Well, since Russia never mobilized or launched a “ full scale invasion” of Ukraine, no need to read beyond the first sentence about what these geniuses think the Russians are going to do.
But hey I Iearned a new scrabble word…satrapy!
Opinions are like National ReSpew editors - everyone has one.
They start off with a bad premise and run with it. Ukraine is losing the war. Like every other country that doesn’t want to be completely beaten, you make a deal and manage the loss as best you can.
Trying to dictate the terms when you got nothing to bargain with is stupid and expecting other countries to continue to fund your losing war on their dime is also stupid.
People pushing the idea that Ukraine can win if we just give them billions more in aid won’t be happy till all of the west is broke and all the Ukrainians are dead.
Stopping the war with some land lost is better than continuing to let your people, mostly men get killed off.
Paraguay had a meglomanic leader who continued to fight on in the War of the Triple Alliance convinced he could win also. 90% of all the men in the country died. Is this what Zelensky wants? Is this what the warpigs, neo-cons, and other uke supporters want?
Without other countries troops, this is what they can expect if they continue a war of attrition. Russia has too many more people than Ukraine. This is a fact that they seem to ignore.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraguayan_War
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.